Talk to us?

- NEETMDS- courses
NEET MDS Lessons
Periodontology

Localized Aggressive Periodontitis and Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis

Localized Aggressive Periodontitis (LAP)

Localized aggressive periodontitis, previously known as localized juvenile periodontitis, is characterized by specific microbial profiles and clinical features.

  • Microbiota Composition:
    • The microbiota associated with LAP is predominantly composed of:
      • Gram-Negative, Capnophilic, and Anaerobic Rods.
    • Key Organisms:
      • Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: The main organism involved in LAP.
      • Other significant organisms include:
        • Porphyromonas gingivalis
        • Eikenella corrodens
        • Campylobacter rectus
        • Bacteroides capillus
        • Spirochetes (various species).
    • Viral Associations:
      • Herpes viruses, including Epstein-Barr Virus-1 (EBV-1) and Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV), have also been associated with LAP.

Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis (NUG)

  • Microbial Profile:
    • NUG is characterized by high levels of:
      • Prevotella intermedia
      • Spirochetes (various species).
  • Clinical Features:
    • NUG presents with necrosis of the gingival tissue, pain, and ulceration, often accompanied by systemic symptoms.

Microbial Shifts in Periodontal Disease

When comparing the microbiota across different states of periodontal health, a distinct microbial shift can be identified as the disease progresses from health to gingivitis to periodontitis:

  1. From Gram-Positive to Gram-Negative:

    • Healthy gingival sites are predominantly colonized by gram-positive bacteria, while diseased sites show an increase in gram-negative bacteria.
  2. From Cocci to Rods (and Later to Spirochetes):

    • In health, cocci (spherical bacteria) are prevalent. As the disease progresses, there is a shift towards rod-shaped bacteria, and in advanced stages, spirochetes become more prominent.
  3. From Non-Motile to Motile Organisms:

    • Healthy sites are often dominated by non-motile bacteria, while motile organisms increase in number as periodontal disease develops.
  4. From Facultative Anaerobes to Obligate Anaerobes:

    • In health, facultative anaerobes (which can survive with or without oxygen) are common. In contrast, obligate anaerobes (which thrive in the absence of oxygen) become more prevalent in periodontal disease.
  5. From Fermenting to Proteolytic Species:

    • The microbial community shifts from fermentative bacteria, which primarily metabolize carbohydrates, to proteolytic species that break down proteins, contributing to tissue destruction and inflammation.

Dental Calculus

Dental calculus, also known as tartar, is a hard deposit that forms on teeth due to the mineralization of dental plaque. Understanding the composition and crystal forms of calculus is essential for dental professionals in diagnosing and managing periodontal disease.

Crystal Forms in Dental Calculus

  1. Common Crystal Forms:

    • Dental calculus typically contains two or more crystal forms. The most frequently detected forms include:
      • Hydroxyapatite:
        • This is the primary mineral component of both enamel and calculus, constituting a significant portion of the calculus sample.
        • Hydroxyapatite is a crystalline structure that provides strength and stability to the calculus.
      • Octacalcium Phosphate:
        • Detected in a high percentage of supragingival calculus samples (97% to 100%).
        • This form is also a significant contributor to the bulk of calculus.
  2. Other Crystal Forms:

    • Brushite:
      • More commonly found in the mandibular anterior region of the mouth.
      • Brushite is a less stable form of calcium phosphate and may indicate a younger calculus deposit.
    • Magnesium Whitlockite:
      • Typically found in the posterior areas of the mouth.
      • This form may be associated with older calculus deposits and can indicate changes in the mineral composition over time.
  3. Variation with Age:

    • The incidence and types of crystal forms present in calculus can vary with the age of the deposit.
    • Younger calculus deposits may have a higher proportion of brushite, while older deposits may show a predominance of hydroxyapatite and magnesium whitlockite.

Clinical Significance

  1. Understanding Calculus Formation:

    • Knowledge of the crystal forms in calculus can help dental professionals understand the mineralization process and the conditions under which calculus forms.
  2. Implications for Treatment:

    • The composition of calculus can influence treatment strategies. For example, older calculus deposits may be more difficult to remove due to their hardness and mineral content.
  3. Assessment of Periodontal Health:

    • The presence and type of calculus can provide insights into a patient’s oral hygiene practices and periodontal health. Regular monitoring and removal of calculus are essential for preventing periodontal disease.
  4. Research and Development:

    • Understanding the mineral composition of calculus can aid in the development of new dental materials and treatments aimed at preventing calculus formation and promoting oral health.

Periodontics: Dental specialty deals with the supporting and surrounding tissues of the teeth. 

1. Periodontium: tissues that invest and support teeth Includes Gingiva, Alveolar mucosa  Cementum, Periodontal ligament, Alveolar bone, Support bone

2. Periodontal disease: changes to periodontium beyond normal range of variation

a. Specific plaque hypothesis: specific microorganisms cause periodontal disease; mostly anaerobes. Three implicated: Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Bacteriodes forsythus

b. Contributing factors: often a combination of factors

i. Local: calculus (tarter, home for bacteria, ­ with age), traumatic occlusal forces, caries (root caries), overhangs and over-contoured restorations, open contacts with food impaction, missing/malaligned teeth

Invasion of biological width: from free gingival margin -> attached gingiva need ~ 3 mm.  If enter this area -> problems (e.g., resorption)

ii. Host factors: exacerbate periodontal problems; e.g., smoking/tobacco use, pregnancy and puberty (hormonal changes, ­ blood vessel permeability), stress, poor diet

iii.Medications: often -> tissue overgrowth; e.g., oral contraceptives, antidepressants, heart medicines, transplant anti-rejection drugs

iv.Systemic diseases: e.g., diabetes, immunosuppression

B. Gingivitis: inflammation of gingiva; ­ with age; generally reversible

C. Periodontitis: inflammation of supporting tissues of teeth, characterized by loss of attachment (PDL) and bone; generally irreversible

D.       Periodontal disease as risk factor for systemic diseases:

1.        Causes difficulty for diabetics to control blood sugar

2.        Pregnant women with periodontal disease ~ 7 times more likely to have premature and/or underweight baby

3.        Periodontal diseased patients may be at risk for heart disease

Significant Immune Findings in Periodontal Diseases

Periodontal diseases are associated with various immune responses that can influence disease progression and severity. Understanding these immune findings is crucial for diagnosing and managing different forms of periodontal disease.

Immune Findings in Specific Periodontal Diseases

  1. Acute Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis (ANUG):

    • Findings:
      • PMN (Polymorphonuclear neutrophil) chemotactic defect: This defect impairs the ability of neutrophils to migrate to the site of infection, compromising the immune response.
      • Elevated antibody titres to Prevotella intermedia and intermediate-sized spirochetes: Indicates an immune response to specific pathogens associated with the disease.
  2. Pregnancy Gingivitis:

    • Findings:
      • No significant immune findings reported: While pregnancy gingivitis is common, it does not show distinct immune abnormalities compared to other forms of periodontal disease.
  3. Adult Periodontitis:

    • Findings:
      • Elevated antibody titres to Porphyromonas gingivalis and other periodontopathogens: Suggests a heightened immune response to these specific bacteria.
      • Occurrence of immune complexes in tissues: Indicates an immune reaction that may contribute to tissue damage.
      • Immediate hypersensitivity to gingival bacteria: Reflects an exaggerated immune response to bacterial antigens.
      • Cell-mediated immunity to gingival bacteria: Suggests involvement of T-cells in the immune response against periodontal pathogens.
  4. Juvenile Periodontitis:

    • Localized Juvenile Periodontitis (LJP):
      • Findings:
        • PMN chemotactic defect and depressed phagocytosis: Impairs the ability of neutrophils to respond effectively to bacterial invasion.
        • Elevated antibody titres to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: Indicates an immune response to this specific pathogen.
    • Generalized Juvenile Periodontitis (GJP):
      • Findings:
        • PMN chemotactic defect and depressed phagocytosis: Similar to LJP, indicating a compromised immune response.
        • Elevated antibody titres to Porphyromonas gingivalis: Suggests an immune response to this pathogen.
  5. Prepubertal Periodontitis:

    • Findings:
      • PMN chemotactic defect and depressed phagocytosis: Indicates impaired neutrophil function.
      • Elevated antibody titres to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: Suggests an immune response to this pathogen.
  6. Rapid Periodontitis:

    • Findings:
      • Suppressed or enhanced PMN or monocyte chemotaxis: Indicates variability in immune response among individuals.
      • Elevated antibody titres to several gram-negative bacteria: Reflects an immune response to multiple pathogens.
  7. Refractory Periodontitis:

    • Findings:
      • Reduced PMN chemotaxis: Indicates impaired neutrophil migration, which may contribute to disease persistence despite treatment.
  8. Desquamative Gingivitis:

    • Findings:
      • Diagnostic or characteristic immunopathology in two-thirds of cases: Suggests an underlying immune mechanism.
      • Autoimmune etiology in cases resulting from pemphigus and pemphigoid: Indicates that some cases may be due to autoimmune processes affecting the gingival tissue.

Modified Gingival Index (MGI)

The Modified Gingival Index (MGI) is a clinical tool used to assess the severity of gingival inflammation. It provides a standardized method for evaluating the health of the gingival tissues, which is essential for diagnosing periodontal conditions and monitoring treatment outcomes. Understanding the scoring criteria of the MGI is crucial for dental professionals in their assessments.

Scoring Criteria for the Modified Gingival Index (MGI)

The MGI uses a scale from 0 to 4 to classify the degree of gingival inflammation. Each score corresponds to specific clinical findings:

  1. Score 0: Absence of Inflammation

    • Description: No signs of inflammation are present in the gingival tissues.
    • Clinical Significance: Indicates healthy gingiva with no bleeding or other pathological changes.
  2. Score 1: Mild Inflammation

    • Description:
      • Slight change in color (e.g., slight redness).
      • Little change in texture of any portion of the marginal or papillary gingival unit, but not affecting the entire unit.
    • Clinical Significance: Suggests early signs of gingival inflammation, which may require monitoring and preventive measures.
  3. Score 2: Mild Inflammation (Widespread)

    • Description:
      • Similar criteria as Score 1, but involving the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit.
    • Clinical Significance: Indicates a more widespread mild inflammation that may necessitate intervention to prevent progression.
  4. Score 3: Moderate Inflammation

    • Description:
      • Glazing of the gingiva.
      • Redness, edema, and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival unit.
    • Clinical Significance: Reflects a moderate level of inflammation that may require active treatment to reduce inflammation and restore gingival health.
  5. Score 4: Severe Inflammation

    • Description:
      • Marked redness, edema, and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival unit.
      • Presence of spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration.
    • Clinical Significance: Indicates severe gingival disease that requires immediate intervention and may be associated with periodontal disease.

Clinical Application of the MGI

  1. Assessment of Gingival Health:

    • The MGI provides a systematic approach to evaluate gingival health, allowing for consistent documentation of inflammation levels.
  2. Monitoring Treatment Outcomes:

    • Regular use of the MGI can help track changes in gingival health over time, assessing the effectiveness of periodontal treatments and preventive measures.
  3. Patient Education:

    • The MGI can be used to educate patients about their gingival health status, helping them understand the importance of oral hygiene and regular dental visits.
  4. Research and Epidemiological Studies:

    • The MGI is often used in clinical research to evaluate the prevalence and severity of gingival disease in populations.

Periodontal Bone Grafts

Bone grafting is a critical procedure in periodontal surgery, aimed at restoring lost bone and supporting the regeneration of periodontal tissues.

1. Bone Blend

 Bone blend is a mixture of cortical or cancellous bone that is procured using a trephine or rongeurs, placed in an amalgam capsule, and triturated to achieve a slushy osseous mass. This technique allows for the creation of smaller particle sizes, which enhances resorption and replacement with host bone.

Particle Size: The ideal particle size for bone blend is approximately 210 x 105 micrometers.

Rationale: Smaller particle sizes improve the chances of resorption and integration with the host bone, making the graft more effective.

2. Types of Periodontal Bone Grafts

A. Autogenous Grafts

Autogenous grafts are harvested from the patient’s own body, providing the best compatibility and healing potential.

  1. Cortical Bone Chips

    • History: First used by Nabers and O'Leary in 1965.
    • Characteristics: Composed of shavings of cortical bone removed during osteoplasty and ostectomy from intraoral sites.
    • Challenges: Larger particle sizes can complicate placement and handling, and there is a potential for sequestration. This method has largely been replaced by autogenous osseous coagulum and bone blend.
  2. Osseous Coagulum and Bone Blend

    • Technique: Intraoral bone is obtained using high- or low-speed round burs and mixed with blood to form an osseous coagulum (Robinson, 1969).
    • Advantages: Overcomes disadvantages of cortical bone chips, such as inability to aspirate during collection and variability in quality and quantity of collected bone.
    • Applications: Used in various periodontal procedures to enhance healing and regeneration.
  3. Intraoral Cancellous Bone and Marrow

    • Sources: Healing bony wounds, extraction sockets, edentulous ridges, mandibular retromolar areas, and maxillary tuberosity.
    • Applications: Provides a rich source of osteogenic cells and growth factors for bone regeneration.
  4. Extraoral Cancellous Bone and Marrow

    • Sources: Obtained from the anterior or posterior iliac crest.
    • Advantages: Generally offers the greatest potential for new bone growth due to the abundance of cancellous bone and marrow.

B. Bone Allografts

Bone allografts are harvested from donors and can be classified into three main types:

  1. Undermineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA)

    • Introduction: Introduced in 1976 by Mellonig et al.
    • Process: Freeze drying removes approximately 95% of the water from bone, preserving morphology, solubility, and chemical integrity while reducing antigenicity.
    • Efficacy: FDBA combined with autogenous bone is more effective than FDBA alone, particularly in treating furcation involvements.
  2. Demineralized (Decalcified) FDBA

    • Mechanism: Demineralization enhances osteogenic potential by exposing bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) in the bone matrix.
    • Osteoinduction vs. Osteoconduction: Demineralized grafts induce new bone formation (osteoinduction), while undermineralized allografts facilitate bone growth by providing a scaffold (osteoconduction).
  3. Frozen Iliac Cancellous Bone and Marrow

    • Usage: Used sparingly due to variability in outcomes and potential complications.

Comparison of Allografts and Alloplasts

  • Clinical Outcomes: Both FDBA and DFDBA have been compared to porous particulate hydroxyapatite, showing little difference in post-treatment clinical parameters.
  • Histological Healing: Grafts of DFDBA typically heal with regeneration of the periodontium, while synthetic bone grafts (alloplasts) heal by repair, which may not restore the original periodontal architecture.

Dental Plaque

Dental plaque is a biofilm that forms on the surfaces of teeth and is composed of a diverse community of microorganisms. The development of dental plaque occurs in stages, beginning with primary colonizers and progressing to secondary colonization and plaque maturation.

Primary Colonizers

  • Timeframe:
    • Acquired within a few hours after tooth cleaning or exposure.
  • Characteristics:
    • Predominantly gram-positive facultative microbes.
  • Key Species:
    • Actinomyces viscosus
    • Streptococcus sanguis
  • Adhesion Mechanism:
    • Primary colonizers adhere to the tooth surface through specific adhesins.
    • For example, A. viscosus possesses fimbriae that bind to proline-rich proteins in the dental pellicle, facilitating initial attachment.

Secondary Colonization and Plaque Maturation

  • Microbial Composition:
    • As plaque matures, it becomes predominantly populated by gram-negative anaerobic microorganisms.
  • Key Species:
    • Prevotella intermedia
    • Prevotella loescheii
    • Capnocytophaga spp.
    • Fusobacterium nucleatum
    • Porphyromonas gingivalis
  • Coaggregation:
    • Coaggregation refers to the ability of different species and genera of plaque microorganisms to adhere to one another.
    • This process occurs primarily through highly specific stereochemical interactions of protein and carbohydrate molecules on cell surfaces, along with hydrophobic, electrostatic, and van der Waals forces.

Plaque Hypotheses

  1. Specific Plaque Hypothesis:

    • This hypothesis posits that only certain types of plaque are pathogenic.
    • The pathogenicity of plaque depends on the presence or increase of specific microorganisms.
    • It predicts that plaque harboring specific bacterial pathogens leads to periodontal disease due to the production of substances that mediate the destruction of host tissues.
  2. Nonspecific Plaque Hypothesis:

    • This hypothesis maintains that periodontal disease results from the overall activity of the entire plaque microflora.
    • It suggests that the elaboration of noxious products by the entire microbial community contributes to periodontal disease, rather than specific pathogens alone.

Explore by Exams