Mercury Release in Dental Procedures Involving Amalgam

Mercury is a key component of dental amalgam, and its release during various dental procedures has been a topic of concern due to potential health risks. Understanding the amounts of mercury released during different stages of amalgam handling is essential for dental professionals to implement safety measures and minimize exposure.

1. Mercury Release Quantification

A. Trituration

• Amount Released: 1-2 µg
• Description: Trituration is the process of mixing mercury with alloy particles to form a homogenous amalgam. During this process, small amounts of mercury can be released into the air, which can contribute to overall exposure.

B. Placement of Amalgam Restoration

• Amount Released: 6-8 µg
• Description: When placing an amalgam restoration, additional mercury may be released due to the manipulation of the material. This includes the handling and packing of the amalgam into the cavity preparation.

C. Dry Polishing

• Amount Released: 44 µg
• Description: Dry polishing of amalgam restorations generates the highest amount of mercury release among the listed procedures. The friction and heat generated during dry polishing can vaporize mercury, leading to increased exposure.

D. Wet Polishing

• Amount Released: 2-4 µg
• Description: Wet polishing, which involves the use of water to cool the restoration during polishing, results in significantly lower mercury release compared to dry polishing. The water helps to capture and reduce the amount of mercury vapor released into the air.

Pit and Fissure Sealants

Pit and fissure sealants are preventive dental materials applied to the occlusal surfaces of teeth to prevent caries in the pits and fissures. These sealants work by filling in the grooves and depressions on the tooth surface, thereby eliminating the sheltered environment where bacteria can thrive and cause decay.

Classification

Mitchell and Gordon (1990) classified pit and fissure sealants based on their composition and properties. While the specific classification details are not provided in the prompt, sealants can generally be categorized into:

1. Resin-Based Sealants: These are the most common type, made from composite resins that provide good adhesion and durability.
2. Glass Ionomer Sealants: These sealants release fluoride and bond chemically to the tooth structure, providing additional protection against caries.
3. Polyacid-Modified Resin Sealants: These combine properties of both resin and glass ionomer sealants, offering improved adhesion and fluoride release.

Requisites of an Efficient Sealant

For a pit and fissure sealant to be effective, it should possess the following characteristics:

• Viscosity: The sealant should be viscous enough to penetrate deep into pits and fissures.
• Adequate Working Time: Sufficient time for application and manipulation before curing.
• Low Sorption and Solubility: The material should have low water sorption and solubility to maintain its integrity in the oral environment.
• Rapid Cure: Quick curing time to allow for efficient application and patient comfort.
• Good Adhesion: Strong and prolonged adhesion to enamel to prevent microleakage.
• Wear Resistance: The sealant should withstand the forces of mastication without wearing away.
• Minimum Tissue Irritation: The material should be biocompatible and cause minimal irritation to oral tissues.
• Cariostatic Action: Ideally, the sealant should have properties that inhibit the growth of caries-causing bacteria.

Indications for Use

Pit and fissure sealants are indicated in the following situations:

• Newly Erupted Teeth: Particularly primary molars and permanent premolars and molars that have recently erupted (within the last 4 years).
• Open or Sticky Pits and Fissures: Teeth with pits and fissures that are not well coalesced and may trap food particles.
• Stained Pits and Fissures: Teeth with stained pits and fissures showing minimal decalcification.

Contraindications for Use

Pit and fissure sealants should not be used in the following situations:

• No Previous Caries Experience: Teeth that have no history of caries and have well-coalesced pits and fissures.
• Self-Cleansable Pits and Fissures: Wide pits and fissures that can be effectively cleaned by normal oral hygiene.
• Caries-Free for Over 4 Years: Teeth that have been caries-free for more than 4 years.
• Proximal Caries: Presence of caries on proximal surfaces, either clinically or radiographically.
• Partially Erupted Teeth: Teeth that cannot be adequately isolated during the sealing process.

Key Points for Sealant Application

Age Range for Sealant Application

• 3-4 Years of Age: Application is recommended for newly erupted primary molars.
• 6-7 Years of Age: First permanent molars typically erupt during this age, making them prime candidates for sealant application.
• 11-13 Years of Age: Second permanent molars and premolars should be considered for sealants as they erupt.

Hybridization in Dental Bonding

Hybridization, as described by Nakabayashi in 1982, is a critical process in dental bonding that involves the formation of a hybrid layer. This hybrid layer plays a vital role in achieving micromechanical bonding between the tooth structure (dentin) and resin materials used in restorative dentistry.

1. Definition of Hybridization

Hybridization refers to the process of forming a hybrid layer at the interface between demineralized dentin and resin materials. This phenomenon is characterized by the interlocking of resin within the demineralized dentin surface, which enhances the bond strength between the tooth and the resin.

A. Formation of the Hybrid Layer

• Conditioning Dentin: When dentin is treated with a conditioner (usually an acid), it removes minerals from the dentin, exposing the collagen fibril network and creating inter-fibrillar microporosities.
• Application of Primer: A low-viscosity primer is then applied, which infiltrates these microporosities.
• Polymerization: After the primer is applied, the resin monomers polymerize, forming the hybrid layer.

2. Zones of the Hybrid Layer

The hybrid layer is composed of three distinct zones, each with unique characteristics:

A. Top Layer

• Composition: This layer consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and inter-fibrillar spaces that are filled with resin.
• Function: The presence of resin in this layer enhances the bonding strength and provides a flexible interface that can accommodate stress during functional loading.

B. Middle Layer

• Composition: In this zone, the hydroxyapatite crystals that were originally present in the dentin have been replaced by resin monomers due to the hybridization process.
• Function: This replacement contributes to the mechanical properties of the hybrid layer, providing a strong bond between the dentin and the resin.

C. Bottom Layer

• Composition: This layer consists of dentin that is almost unaffected, with a partly demineralized zone.
• Function: The presence of this layer helps maintain the integrity of the underlying dentin structure while still allowing for effective bonding.

3. Importance of the Hybrid Layer

The hybrid layer is crucial for the success of adhesive dentistry for several reasons:

• Micromechanical Bonding: The hybrid layer facilitates micromechanical bonding, which is essential for the retention of composite resins and other restorative materials.
• Stress Distribution: The hybrid layer helps distribute stress during functional loading, reducing the risk of debonding or failure of the restoration.
• Sealing Ability: A well-formed hybrid layer can help seal the dentin tubules, reducing sensitivity and protecting the pulp from potential irritants.

Rotational Speeds of Dental Instruments

1. Measurement of Rotational Speed

Revolutions Per Minute (RPM)

• Definition: The rotational speed of dental instruments is measured in revolutions per minute (rpm), indicating how many complete rotations the instrument makes in one minute.
• Importance: Understanding the rpm is essential for selecting the appropriate instrument for specific dental procedures, as different speeds are suited for different tasks.

2. Speed Ranges of Dental Instruments

A. Low-Speed Instruments

• Speed Range: Below 12,000 rpm.
• Applications:
  • Finishing and Polishing: Low-speed handpieces are commonly used for finishing and polishing restorations, as they provide greater control and reduce the risk of overheating the tooth structure.
  • Cavity Preparation: They can also be used for initial cavity preparation, especially in areas where precision is required.
• Instruments: Low-speed handpieces, contra-angle attachments, and slow-speed burs.

B. Medium-Speed Instruments

• Speed Range: 12,000 to 200,000 rpm.
• Applications:
  • Cavity Preparation: Medium-speed handpieces are often used for more aggressive cavity preparation and tooth reduction, providing a balance between speed and control.
  • Crown Preparation: They are suitable for preparing teeth for crowns and other restorations.
• Instruments: Medium-speed handpieces and specific burs designed for this speed range.

C. High-Speed Instruments

• Speed Range: Above 200,000 rpm.
• Applications:
  • Rapid Cutting: High-speed handpieces are primarily used for cutting hard dental tissues, such as enamel and dentin, due to their ability to remove material quickly and efficiently.
  • Cavity Preparation: They are commonly used for cavity preparations, crown preparations, and other procedures requiring rapid tooth reduction.
• Instruments: High-speed handpieces and diamond burs, which are designed to withstand the high speeds and provide effective cutting.

3. Clinical Implications

A. Efficiency and Effectiveness

• Material Removal: Higher speeds allow for faster material removal, which can reduce chair time for patients and improve workflow in the dental office.
• Precision: Lower speeds provide greater control, which is essential for delicate procedures and finishing work.

B. Heat Generation

• Risk of Overheating: High-speed instruments can generate significant heat, which may lead to pulpal damage if not managed properly. Adequate cooling with water spray is essential during high-speed procedures to prevent overheating of the tooth.

C. Instrument Selection

• Choosing the Right Speed: Dentists must select the appropriate speed based on the procedure being performed, the type of material being cut, and the desired outcome. Understanding the characteristics of each speed range helps in making informed decisions.

Pouring the Final Impression

Technique

• Mixing Die Stone: A high-strength die stone is mixed using a vacuum mechanical mixer to ensure a homogenous mixture without air bubbles.
• Pouring Process:
  • The die stone is poured into the impression using a vibrator and a No. 7 spatula.
  • The first increments should be applied in small amounts, allowing the material to flow into the remote corners and angles of the preparation without trapping air.
• Surface Tension-Reducing Agents: These agents can be added to the die stone to enhance its flow properties, allowing it to penetrate deep into the internal corners of the impression.

Final Dimensions

• The impression should be filled sufficiently so that the dies will be approximately 15 to 20 mm tall occluso-gingivally after trimming. This height is important for the stability and accuracy of the final restoration.

Composite Cavity Preparation

Composite cavity preparations are designed to optimize the placement and retention of composite resin materials in restorative dentistry. There are three basic designs for composite cavity preparations: Conventional, Beveled Conventional, and Modified. Each design has specific characteristics and indications based on the clinical situation.

1. Conventional Preparation Design

A. Characteristics

• Design: Similar to cavity preparations for amalgam restorations.
• Shape: Box-like cavity with slight occlusal convergence, flat floors, and undercuts in dentin.
• Cavosurface Angle: Near 90° (butt joint), which provides a strong interface for the restoration.

B. Indications

• Moderate to Large Class I and Class II Restorations: Suitable for larger cavities where significant tooth structure is missing.
• Replacement of Existing Amalgam: When an existing amalgam restoration needs to be replaced, a conventional preparation is often indicated.
• Class II Cavities Extending onto the Root: In cases where the cavity extends onto the root, a conventional design is preferred to ensure adequate retention and support.

2. Beveled Conventional Preparation

A. Characteristics

• Enamel Cavosurface Bevel: Incorporation of a bevel at the enamel margin to increase surface area for bonding.
• End-on-Etching: The bevel allows for more effective etching of the enamel rods, enhancing adhesion.
• Benefits:
  • Improves retention of the composite material.
  • Reduces microleakage at the restoration interface.
  • Strengthens the remaining tooth structure.

B. Preparation Technique

• Bevel Preparation: The bevel is created using a flame-shaped diamond instrument, approximately 0.5 mm wide and angled at 45° to the external enamel surface.

C. Indications

• Large Area Restorations: Ideal for restoring larger areas of tooth structure.
• Replacing Existing Restorations: Suitable for class III, IV, and VI cavities where composite is used to replace older restorations.
• Rarely Used for Posterior Restorations: While effective, this design is less commonly used for posterior teeth due to aesthetic considerations.

3. Modified Preparation

A. Characteristics

• Depth of Preparation: Does not routinely extend into dentin; the depth is determined by the extent of the carious lesion.
• Wall Configuration: No specified wall configuration, allowing for flexibility in design.
• Conservation of Tooth Structure: Aims to conserve as much tooth structure as possible while obtaining retention through micro-mechanical means (acid etching).
• Appearance: Often has a scooped-out appearance, reflecting its conservative nature.

B. Indications

• Small Cavitated Carious Lesions: Best suited for small carious lesions that are surrounded by enamel.
• Correcting Enamel Defects: Effective for addressing minor enamel defects without extensive preparation.

C. Modified Preparation Designs

• Class III (A and B): For anterior teeth, focusing on small defects or carious lesions.
• Class IV (C and D): For anterior teeth with larger defects, ensuring minimal loss of healthy tooth structure.