Aggressive Periodontitis (formerly Juvenile Periodontitis)

• Historical Names: Previously referred to as periodontosis, deep cementopathia, diseases of eruption, Gottleib’s diseases, and periodontitis marginalis progressive.
• Risk Factors:
  • High frequency of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans.
  • Immune defects (functional defects of PMNs and monocytes).
  • Autoimmunity and genetic factors.
  • Environmental factors, including smoking.
• Clinical Features:
  • Vertical loss of alveolar bone around the first molars and incisors, typically beginning around puberty.
  • Bone loss patterns often described as "target" or "bull" shaped lesions.

Periodontal Bone Grafts

Bone grafting is a critical procedure in periodontal surgery, aimed at restoring lost bone and supporting the regeneration of periodontal tissues.

1. Bone Blend

 Bone blend is a mixture of cortical or cancellous bone that is procured using a trephine or rongeurs, placed in an amalgam capsule, and triturated to achieve a slushy osseous mass. This technique allows for the creation of smaller particle sizes, which enhances resorption and replacement with host bone.

Particle Size: The ideal particle size for bone blend is approximately 210 x 105 micrometers.

Rationale: Smaller particle sizes improve the chances of resorption and integration with the host bone, making the graft more effective.

2. Types of Periodontal Bone Grafts

A. Autogenous Grafts

Autogenous grafts are harvested from the patient’s own body, providing the best compatibility and healing potential.

1. Cortical Bone Chips

   • History: First used by Nabers and O'Leary in 1965.
   • Characteristics: Composed of shavings of cortical bone removed during osteoplasty and ostectomy from intraoral sites.
   • Challenges: Larger particle sizes can complicate placement and handling, and there is a potential for sequestration. This method has largely been replaced by autogenous osseous coagulum and bone blend.

2. Osseous Coagulum and Bone Blend

   • Technique: Intraoral bone is obtained using high- or low-speed round burs and mixed with blood to form an osseous coagulum (Robinson, 1969).
   • Advantages: Overcomes disadvantages of cortical bone chips, such as inability to aspirate during collection and variability in quality and quantity of collected bone.
   • Applications: Used in various periodontal procedures to enhance healing and regeneration.

3. Intraoral Cancellous Bone and Marrow

   • Sources: Healing bony wounds, extraction sockets, edentulous ridges, mandibular retromolar areas, and maxillary tuberosity.
   • Applications: Provides a rich source of osteogenic cells and growth factors for bone regeneration.

4. Extraoral Cancellous Bone and Marrow

   • Sources: Obtained from the anterior or posterior iliac crest.
   • Advantages: Generally offers the greatest potential for new bone growth due to the abundance of cancellous bone and marrow.

B. Bone Allografts

Bone allografts are harvested from donors and can be classified into three main types:

1. Undermineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA)

   • Introduction: Introduced in 1976 by Mellonig et al.
   • Process: Freeze drying removes approximately 95% of the water from bone, preserving morphology, solubility, and chemical integrity while reducing antigenicity.
   • Efficacy: FDBA combined with autogenous bone is more effective than FDBA alone, particularly in treating furcation involvements.

2. Demineralized (Decalcified) FDBA

   • Mechanism: Demineralization enhances osteogenic potential by exposing bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) in the bone matrix.
   • Osteoinduction vs. Osteoconduction: Demineralized grafts induce new bone formation (osteoinduction), while undermineralized allografts facilitate bone growth by providing a scaffold (osteoconduction).

3. Frozen Iliac Cancellous Bone and Marrow

   • Usage: Used sparingly due to variability in outcomes and potential complications.

Comparison of Allografts and Alloplasts

• Clinical Outcomes: Both FDBA and DFDBA have been compared to porous particulate hydroxyapatite, showing little difference in post-treatment clinical parameters.
• Histological Healing: Grafts of DFDBA typically heal with regeneration of the periodontium, while synthetic bone grafts (alloplasts) heal by repair, which may not restore the original periodontal architecture.

Acquired Pellicle in the Oral Cavity

The acquired pellicle is a crucial component of oral health, serving as the first line of defense in the oral cavity and playing a significant role in the initial stages of biofilm formation on tooth surfaces. Understanding the composition, formation, and function of the acquired pellicle is essential for dental professionals in managing oral health.

Composition of the Acquired Pellicle

1. Definition:

   • The acquired pellicle is a thin, organic layer that coats all surfaces in the oral cavity, including both hard (tooth enamel) and soft tissues (gingiva, mucosa).

2. Components:

   • The pellicle consists of more than 180 peptides, proteins, and glycoproteins, which include:
     • Keratins: Structural proteins that provide strength.
     • Mucins: Glycoproteins that contribute to the viscosity and protective properties of saliva.
     • Proline-rich proteins: Involved in the binding of calcium and phosphate.
     • Phosphoproteins: Such as statherin, which helps in maintaining calcium levels and preventing mineral loss.
     • Histidine-rich proteins: May play a role in buffering and mineralization.
   • These components function as adhesion sites (receptors) for bacteria, facilitating the initial colonization of tooth surfaces.

Formation and Maturation of the Acquired Pellicle

1. Rapid Formation:

   • The salivary pellicle can be detected on clean enamel surfaces within 1 minute after exposure to saliva. This rapid formation is crucial for protecting the enamel and providing a substrate for bacterial adhesion.

2. Equilibrium State:

   • By 2 hours, the pellicle reaches a state of equilibrium between adsorption (the process of molecules adhering to the surface) and detachment. This dynamic balance allows for the continuous exchange of molecules within the pellicle.

3. Maturation:

   • Although the initial pellicle formation occurs quickly, further maturation can be observed over several hours. This maturation process involves the incorporation of additional salivary components and the establishment of a more complex structure.

Interaction with Bacteria

1. Bacterial Adhesion:

   • Bacteria that adhere to tooth surfaces do not contact the enamel directly; instead, they interact with the acquired enamel pellicle. This interaction is critical for the formation of dental biofilms (plaque).

2. Active Role of the Pellicle:

   • The acquired pellicle is not merely a passive adhesion matrix. Many proteins within the pellicle retain enzymatic activity when incorporated. Some of these enzymes include:
     • Peroxidases: Enzymes that can break down hydrogen peroxide and may have antimicrobial properties.
     • Lysozyme: An enzyme that can lyse bacterial cell walls, contributing to the antibacterial defense.
     • α-Amylase: An enzyme that breaks down starches and may influence the metabolism of adhering bacteria.

Clinical Significance

1. Role in Oral Health:

   • The acquired pellicle plays a protective role by providing a barrier against acids and bacteria, helping to maintain the integrity of tooth enamel and soft tissues.

2. Biofilm Formation:

   • Understanding the role of the pellicle in bacterial adhesion is essential for managing plaque-related diseases, such as dental caries and periodontal disease.

3. Preventive Strategies:

   • Dental professionals can use knowledge of the acquired pellicle to develop preventive strategies, such as promoting saliva flow and maintaining good oral hygiene practices to minimize plaque accumulation.

4. Therapeutic Applications:

   • The enzymatic activities of pellicle proteins can be targeted in the development of therapeutic agents aimed at enhancing oral health and preventing bacterial colonization.

Changes in Plaque pH After Sucrose Rinse

The pH of dental plaque is a critical factor in the development of dental caries and periodontal disease. Key findings from various studies that investigated the changes in plaque pH following carbohydrate rinses, particularly focusing on sucrose and glucose.

Key Findings from Studies

1. Monitoring Plaque pH Changes:

   • A study reported that changes in plaque pH after a sucrose rinse were monitored using plaque sampling, antimony and glass electrodes, and telemetry.
   • Results:
     • The minimum pH at approximal sites (areas between teeth) was approximately 0.7 pH units lower than that on buccal surfaces (outer surfaces of the teeth).
     • The pH at the approximal site remained below resting levels for over 120 minutes.
     • The area under the pH response curves from approximal sites was five times greater than that from buccal surfaces, indicating a more significant and prolonged acidogenic response in interproximal areas.

2. Stephan's Early Studies (1935):

   • Method: Colorimetric measurement of plaque pH suspended in water.
   • Findings:
     • The pH of 211 plaque samples ranged from 4.6 to 7.0.
     • The mean pH value was found to be 5.9, indicating a generally acidic environment in dental plaque.

3. Stephan's Follow-Up Studies (1940):

   • Method: Use of an antimony electrode to measure in situ plaque pH after rinsing with sugar solutions.
   • Findings:
     • A 10% solution of glucose or sucrose caused a rapid drop in plaque pH by about 2 units within 2 to 5 minutes, reaching values between 4.5 and 5.0.
     • A 1% lactose solution lowered the pH by 0.3 units, while a 1% glucose solution caused a drop of 1.5 units.
     • A 1% boiled starch solution resulted in a reduction of 1.5 pH units over 51 minutes.
     • In all cases, the pH tended to return to initial values within approximately 2 hours.

4. Investigation of Proximal Cavities:

   • Studies of actual proximal cavities opened mechanically showed that the lowest pH values ranged from 4.6 to 4.1.
   • After rinsing with a 10% glucose or sucrose solution, the pH in the plaque dropped to between 4.5 and 5.0 within 2 to 5 minutes and gradually returned to baseline levels within 1 to 2 hours.

Implications

• The studies highlight the significant impact of carbohydrate exposure, particularly sucrose and glucose, on the pH of dental plaque.
• The rapid drop in pH following carbohydrate rinses indicates an acidogenic response from plaque microorganisms, which can contribute to enamel demineralization and caries development.
• The prolonged acidic environment in approximal sites suggests that these areas may be more susceptible to caries due to the slower recovery of pH levels.

Significant Immune Findings in Periodontal Diseases

Periodontal diseases are associated with various immune responses that can influence disease progression and severity. Understanding these immune findings is crucial for diagnosing and managing different forms of periodontal disease.

Immune Findings in Specific Periodontal Diseases

1. Acute Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis (ANUG):

   • Findings:
     • PMN (Polymorphonuclear neutrophil) chemotactic defect: This defect impairs the ability of neutrophils to migrate to the site of infection, compromising the immune response.
     • Elevated antibody titres to Prevotella intermedia and intermediate-sized spirochetes: Indicates an immune response to specific pathogens associated with the disease.

2. Pregnancy Gingivitis:

   • Findings:
     • No significant immune findings reported: While pregnancy gingivitis is common, it does not show distinct immune abnormalities compared to other forms of periodontal disease.

3. Adult Periodontitis:

   • Findings:
     • Elevated antibody titres to Porphyromonas gingivalis and other periodontopathogens: Suggests a heightened immune response to these specific bacteria.
     • Occurrence of immune complexes in tissues: Indicates an immune reaction that may contribute to tissue damage.
     • Immediate hypersensitivity to gingival bacteria: Reflects an exaggerated immune response to bacterial antigens.
     • Cell-mediated immunity to gingival bacteria: Suggests involvement of T-cells in the immune response against periodontal pathogens.

4. Juvenile Periodontitis:

   • Localized Juvenile Periodontitis (LJP):
     • Findings:
       • PMN chemotactic defect and depressed phagocytosis: Impairs the ability of neutrophils to respond effectively to bacterial invasion.
       • Elevated antibody titres to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: Indicates an immune response to this specific pathogen.
   • Generalized Juvenile Periodontitis (GJP):
     • Findings:
       • PMN chemotactic defect and depressed phagocytosis: Similar to LJP, indicating a compromised immune response.
       • Elevated antibody titres to Porphyromonas gingivalis: Suggests an immune response to this pathogen.

5. Prepubertal Periodontitis:

   • Findings:
     • PMN chemotactic defect and depressed phagocytosis: Indicates impaired neutrophil function.
     • Elevated antibody titres to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: Suggests an immune response to this pathogen.

6. Rapid Periodontitis:

   • Findings:
     • Suppressed or enhanced PMN or monocyte chemotaxis: Indicates variability in immune response among individuals.
     • Elevated antibody titres to several gram-negative bacteria: Reflects an immune response to multiple pathogens.

7. Refractory Periodontitis:

   • Findings:
     • Reduced PMN chemotaxis: Indicates impaired neutrophil migration, which may contribute to disease persistence despite treatment.

8. Desquamative Gingivitis:

   • Findings:
     • Diagnostic or characteristic immunopathology in two-thirds of cases: Suggests an underlying immune mechanism.
     • Autoimmune etiology in cases resulting from pemphigus and pemphigoid: Indicates that some cases may be due to autoimmune processes affecting the gingival tissue.

Assessing New Attachment in Periodontal Therapy

Assessing new attachment following periodontal therapy is crucial for evaluating treatment outcomes and understanding the healing process. However, various methods of assessment have limitations that must be considered. This lecture will discuss the reliability of different assessment methods for new attachment, including periodontal probing, radiographic analysis, and histologic methods.

1. Periodontal Probing

• Assessment Method: Periodontal probing is commonly used to measure probing depth and attachment levels before and after therapy.

• Limitations:

  • Coronal Positioning of Probe Tip: After therapy, when the inflammatory lesion is resolved, the probe tip may stop coronal to the apical termination of the epithelium. This can lead to misleading interpretations of attachment gain.
  • Infrabony Defects: Following treatment of infrabony defects, new bone may form so close to the tooth surface that the probe cannot penetrate. This can result in a false impression of improved attachment levels.
  • Interpretation of Results: A gain in probing attachment level does not necessarily indicate a true gain of connective tissue attachment. Instead, it may reflect improved health of the surrounding tissues, which increases resistance to probe penetration.

2. Radiographic Analysis and Reentry Operations

• Assessment Method: Radiographic analysis involves comparing radiographs taken before and after therapy to evaluate changes in bone levels. Reentry operations allow for direct inspection of the treated area.

• Limitations:

  • Bone Fill vs. New Attachment: While radiographs can provide evidence of new bone formation (bone fill), they do not document the formation of new root cementum or a new periodontal ligament. Therefore, radiographic evidence alone cannot confirm the establishment of new attachment.

3. Histologic Methods

• Assessment Method: Histologic analysis involves examining tissue samples under a microscope to assess the formation of new attachment, including new cementum and periodontal ligament.

• Advantages:

  • Validity: Histologic methods are considered the only valid approach to assess the formation of new attachment accurately.

• Limitations:

  • Pre-Therapy Assessment: Accurate assessment of the attachment level prior to therapy is essential for histologic analysis. If the initial attachment level cannot be determined with certainty, it may compromise the validity of the findings.