Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis (NUG)

Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis (NUG), also known as Vincent's disease or trench mouth, is a severe form of periodontal disease characterized by the sudden onset of symptoms and specific clinical features.

Etiology and Predisposing Factors

• Sudden Onset: NUG is characterized by a rapid onset of symptoms, often following debilitating diseases or acute respiratory infections.
• Lifestyle Factors: Changes in living habits, such as prolonged work without adequate rest, poor nutrition, tobacco use, and psychological stress, are frequently noted in patient histories .
• Smoking: Smoking has been identified as a significant predisposing factor for NUG/NDP .
• Immune Compromise: Conditions that compromise the immune system, such as poor oral hygiene, smoking, and emotional stress, are major contributors to the development of NUG .

Clinical Presentation

• Symptoms: NUG presents with:
  • Punched-out, crater-like depressions at the crest of interdental papillae.
  • Marginal gingival involvement, with rare extension to attached gingiva and oral mucosa.
  • Grey, pseudomembranous slough covering the lesions.
  • Spontaneous bleeding upon slight stimulation of the gingiva.
  • Fetid odor and increased salivation.

Microbiology

• Mixed Bacterial Infection: NUG is caused by a complex of anaerobic bacteria, often referred to as the fusospirochetal complex, which includes:
  • Treponema vincentii
  • Treponema denticola
  • Treponema macrodentium
  • Fusobacterium nucleatum
  • Prevotella intermedia
  • Porphyromonas gingivalis

Treatment

1. Control of Acute Phase:

   • Clean the wound with an antibacterial agent.
   • Irrigate the lesion with warm water and 5% vol/vol hydrogen peroxide.
   • Prescribe oxygen-releasing mouthwash (e.g., hydrogen peroxide DPF, sodium perborate DPF) to be used thrice daily.
   • Administer oral metronidazole for 3 to 5 days. If sensitive to metronidazole, prescribe penicillin; if sensitive to both, consider erythromycin or clindamycin.
   • Use 2% chlorhexidine in select cases for a short duration.

2. Management of Residual Condition:

   • Remove predisposing local factors (e.g., overhangs).
   • Perform supra- and subgingival scaling.
   • Consider gingivoplasty to correct any residual gingival deformities.

Hypercementosis

Hypercementosis is a dental condition characterized by the excessive deposition of cementum on the roots of teeth. This condition can have various clinical implications and is associated with several underlying factors. Understanding hypercementosis is essential for dental professionals in diagnosing and managing related conditions.

Characteristics of Hypercementosis

1. Definition:

   • Hypercementosis is defined as a generalized thickening of the cementum, often accompanied by nodular enlargement of the apical third of the root. It can also manifest as spike-like excrescences known as cemental spikes.

2. Forms of Hypercementosis:

   • Generalized Type: Involves a uniform thickening of cementum across multiple teeth.
   • Localized Type: Characterized by nodular enlargements or cemental spikes, which may result from:
     • Coalescence of cementicles adhering to the root.
     • Calcification of periodontal fibers at their insertion points into the cementum.

Radiographic Appearance

• Radiographic Features:
  • On radiographs, hypercementosis is identified by the presence of a radiolucent shadow of the periodontal ligament and a radiopaque lamina dura surrounding the area of hypercementosis, similar to normal cementum.
  • Differentiation:
    • Hypercementosis can be differentiated from other conditions such as periapical cemental dysplasia, condensing osteitis, and focal periapical osteopetrosis, as these entities are located outside the shadow of the periodontal ligament and lamina dura.

Etiology of Hypercementosis

• Varied Etiology:

  • The exact cause of hypercementosis is not completely understood, but several factors have been identified:
    • Spike-like Hypercementosis: Often results from excessive tension due to orthodontic appliances or occlusal forces.
    • Generalized Hypercementosis: Can occur in various circumstances, including:
      • Teeth Without Antagonists: In cases where teeth lack opposing teeth, hypercementosis may develop as a compensatory mechanism to keep pace with excessive tooth eruption.
      • Low-Grade Periapical Irritation: Associated with pulp disease, where hypercementosis serves as compensation for the loss of fibrous attachment to the tooth.

• Systemic Associations:

  • Hypercementosis may also be observed in systemic conditions, including:
    • Paget’s Disease: Characterized by hypercementosis of the entire dentition.
    • Other Conditions: Acromegaly, arthritis, calcinosis, rheumatic fever, and thyroid goiter have also been linked to hypercementosis.

Clinical Implications

1. Diagnosis:

   • Recognizing hypercementosis is important for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. Radiographic evaluation is essential for distinguishing hypercementosis from other dental pathologies.

2. Management:

   • While hypercementosis itself may not require treatment, it can complicate dental procedures such as extractions or endodontic treatments. Understanding the condition can help clinicians anticipate potential challenges.

3. Monitoring:

   • Regular monitoring of patients with known systemic conditions associated with hypercementosis is important to manage any potential complications.

Localized Aggressive Periodontitis and Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis

Localized Aggressive Periodontitis (LAP)

Localized aggressive periodontitis, previously known as localized juvenile periodontitis, is characterized by specific microbial profiles and clinical features.

• Microbiota Composition:
  • The microbiota associated with LAP is predominantly composed of:
    • Gram-Negative, Capnophilic, and Anaerobic Rods.
  • Key Organisms:
    • Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: The main organism involved in LAP.
    • Other significant organisms include:
      • Porphyromonas gingivalis
      • Eikenella corrodens
      • Campylobacter rectus
      • Bacteroides capillus
      • Spirochetes (various species).
  • Viral Associations:
    • Herpes viruses, including Epstein-Barr Virus-1 (EBV-1) and Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV), have also been associated with LAP.

Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis (NUG)

• Microbial Profile:
  • NUG is characterized by high levels of:
    • Prevotella intermedia
    • Spirochetes (various species).
• Clinical Features:
  • NUG presents with necrosis of the gingival tissue, pain, and ulceration, often accompanied by systemic symptoms.

Microbial Shifts in Periodontal Disease

When comparing the microbiota across different states of periodontal health, a distinct microbial shift can be identified as the disease progresses from health to gingivitis to periodontitis:

1. From Gram-Positive to Gram-Negative:

   • Healthy gingival sites are predominantly colonized by gram-positive bacteria, while diseased sites show an increase in gram-negative bacteria.

2. From Cocci to Rods (and Later to Spirochetes):

   • In health, cocci (spherical bacteria) are prevalent. As the disease progresses, there is a shift towards rod-shaped bacteria, and in advanced stages, spirochetes become more prominent.

3. From Non-Motile to Motile Organisms:

   • Healthy sites are often dominated by non-motile bacteria, while motile organisms increase in number as periodontal disease develops.

4. From Facultative Anaerobes to Obligate Anaerobes:

   • In health, facultative anaerobes (which can survive with or without oxygen) are common. In contrast, obligate anaerobes (which thrive in the absence of oxygen) become more prevalent in periodontal disease.

5. From Fermenting to Proteolytic Species:

   • The microbial community shifts from fermentative bacteria, which primarily metabolize carbohydrates, to proteolytic species that break down proteins, contributing to tissue destruction and inflammation.

Gingival crevicular fluid is an inflammatory exudate found in the gingival sulcus. It plays a significant role in periodontal health and disease.

A. Characteristics of GCF

• Glucose Concentration: The glucose concentration in GCF is 3-4 times greater than that in serum, indicating increased metabolic activity in inflamed tissues.
• Protein Content: The total protein content of GCF is much less than that of serum, reflecting its role as an inflammatory exudate.
• Inflammatory Nature: GCF is present in clinically normal sulci due to the constant low-grade inflammation of the gingiva.

B. Drugs Excreted Through GCF

• Tetracyclines and Metronidazole: These antibiotics are known to be excreted through GCF, making them effective for localized periodontal therapy.

C. Collection Methods for GCF

GCF can be collected using various techniques, including:

1. Absorbing Paper Strips/Blotter/Periopaper: These strips absorb fluid from the sulcus and are commonly used for GCF collection.
2. Twisted Threads: Placing twisted threads around and into the sulcus can help collect GCF.
3. Micropipettes: These can be used for precise collection of GCF in research settings.
4. Intra-Crevicular Washings: Flushing the sulcus with a saline solution can help collect GCF for analysis.

Dark Field Microscopy in Periodontal Microbiology

Dark field microscopy and phase contrast microscopy are valuable techniques in microbiological studies, particularly in the field of periodontal research. These methods allow for the direct observation of bacteria in plaque samples, providing insights into their morphology and motility. This lecture will discuss the principles of dark field microscopy, its applications in periodontal disease assessment, and its limitations.

Dark Field Microscopy

• Definition: Dark field microscopy is a technique that enhances the contrast of unstained, transparent specimens, allowing for the visualization of live microorganisms in their natural state.
• Principle: The method uses a special condenser that directs light at an angle, creating a dark background against which the specimen appears bright. This allows for the observation of motility and morphology without the need for staining.

Applications in Periodontal Microbiology

1. Alternative to Culture Methods:

   • Dark field microscopy has been suggested as a rapid alternative to traditional culture methods for assessing bacterial populations in periodontal plaque samples. It allows for immediate observation of bacteria without the time-consuming process of culturing.

2. Assessment of Morphology and Motility:

   • The technique enables direct and rapid assessment of the morphology (shape and structure) and motility (movement) of bacteria present in plaque samples. This information can be crucial for understanding the dynamics of periodontal disease.

3. Indication of Periodontal Disease Status:

   • Dark field microscopy has been used to indicate the status of periodontal disease and the effectiveness of maintenance programs. By observing the presence and activity of specific bacteria, clinicians can gain insights into the health of periodontal tissues.

Limitations of Dark Field Microscopy

1. Analysis of Major Periodontal Pathogens:

   • While dark field microscopy can visualize motile bacteria, it is important to note that many major periodontal pathogens, such as Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides forsythus, Eikenella corrodens, and Eubacterium species, are motile. However, the technique may not provide detailed information about their specific characteristics or pathogenic potential.

2. Differentiation of Treponema Species:

   • Dark field microscopy cannot differentiate between species of Treponema, which is a limitation when identifying specific pathogens associated with periodontal disease. This lack of specificity can hinder the ability to tailor treatment based on the exact microbial profile.

3. Limited Quantitative Analysis:

   • While dark field microscopy allows for qualitative observations, it may not provide quantitative data on bacterial populations, which can be important for assessing disease severity and treatment outcomes.

Classification of Periodontal Pockets

Periodontal pockets are an important aspect of periodontal disease, reflecting the health of the supporting structures of the teeth. Understanding the classification of these pockets is essential for diagnosis, treatment planning, and management of periodontal conditions.

Classification of Pockets

1. Gingival Pocket:

   • Also Known As: Pseudo-pocket.
   • Formation:
     • Formed by gingival enlargement without destruction of the underlying periodontal tissues.
     • The sulcus is deepened due to the increased bulk of the gingiva.
   • Characteristics:
     • There is no destruction of the supporting periodontal tissues.
     • Typically associated with conditions such as gingival hyperplasia or inflammation.

2. Periodontal Pocket:

   • Definition: A pocket that results in the destruction of the supporting periodontal tissues, leading to the loosening and potential exfoliation of teeth.
   • Classification Based on Location:
     • Suprabony Pocket:
       • The base of the pocket is coronal to the alveolar bone.
       • The pattern of bone destruction is horizontal.
       • The transseptal fibers are arranged horizontally in the space between the base of the pocket and the alveolar bone.
     • Infrabony Pocket:
       • The base of the pocket is apical to the alveolar bone, meaning the pocket wall lies between the bone and the tooth.
       • The pattern of bone destruction is vertical.
       • The transseptal fibers are oblique rather than horizontal.

Classification of Periodontal Pockets

1. Suprabony Pocket (Supracrestal or Supraalveolar):

   • Location: Base of the pocket is coronal to the alveolar bone.
   • Bone Destruction: Horizontal pattern of bone loss.
   • Transseptal Fibers: Arranged horizontally.

2. Infrabony Pocket (Intrabony, Subcrestal, or Intraalveolar):

   • Location: Base of the pocket is apical to the alveolar bone.
   • Bone Destruction: Vertical pattern of bone loss.
   • Transseptal Fibers: Arranged obliquely.

Classification of Pockets According to Involved Tooth Surfaces

1. Simple Pocket:

   • Definition: Involves only one tooth surface.
   • Example: A pocket that is present only on the buccal surface of a tooth.

2. Compound Pocket:

   • Definition: A pocket present on two or more surfaces of a tooth.
   • Example: A pocket that involves both the buccal and lingual surfaces.

3. Spiral Pocket:

   • Definition: Originates on one tooth surface and twists around the tooth to involve one or more additional surfaces.
   • Example: A pocket that starts on the mesial surface and wraps around to the distal surface.