Ecological Succession of Biofilm in Dental Plaque

Overview of Biofilm Formation

Biofilm formation on tooth surfaces is a dynamic process characterized by ecological succession, where microbial communities evolve over time. This process transitions from an early aerobic environment dominated by gram-positive facultative species to a later stage characterized by a highly oxygen-deprived environment where gram-negative anaerobic microorganisms predominate.

Stages of Biofilm Development

1. Initial Colonization:

   • Environment: The initial phase occurs in an aerobic environment.
   • Primary Colonizers:
     • The first bacteria to colonize the pellicle-coated tooth surface are predominantly gram-positive facultative microorganisms.
     • Key Species:
       • Actinomyces viscosus
       • Streptococcus sanguis
   • Characteristics:
     • These bacteria can thrive in the presence of oxygen and play a crucial role in the establishment of the biofilm.

2. Secondary Colonization:

   • Environment: As the biofilm matures, the environment becomes increasingly anaerobic due to the metabolic activities of the initial colonizers.
   • Secondary Colonizers:
     • These microorganisms do not initially colonize clean tooth surfaces but adhere to the existing bacterial cells in the plaque mass.
     • Key Species:
       • Prevotella intermedia
       • Prevotella loescheii
       • Capnocytophaga spp.
       • Fusobacterium nucleatum
       • Porphyromonas gingivalis
   • Coaggregation:
     • Secondary colonizers adhere to primary colonizers through a process known as coaggregation, which involves specific interactions between bacterial cells.

3. Coaggregation Examples:

   • Coaggregation is a critical mechanism that facilitates the establishment of complex microbial communities within the biofilm.
   • Well-Known Examples:
     • Fusobacterium nucleatum with Streptococcus sanguis
     • Prevotella loescheii with Actinomyces viscosus
     • Capnocytophaga ochracea with Actinomyces viscosus

Implications of Ecological Succession

• Microbial Diversity: The transition from gram-positive to gram-negative organisms reflects an increase in microbial diversity and complexity within the biofilm.
• Pathogenic Potential: The accumulation of anaerobic gram-negative bacteria is associated with the development of periodontal diseases, as these organisms can produce virulence factors that contribute to tissue destruction and inflammation.
• Biofilm Stability: The interactions between different bacterial species through coaggregation enhance the stability and resilience of the biofilm, making it more challenging to remove through mechanical cleaning.

----------------------------------------------- 

Subgingival and Supragingival Calculus

Overview of Calculus Formation

Calculus, or tartar, is a hardened form of dental plaque that can form on both supragingival (above the gum line) and subgingival (below the gum line) surfaces. Understanding the differences between these two types of calculus is essential for effective periodontal disease management.

Subgingival Calculus

1. Color and Composition:

   • Appearance: Subgingival calculus is typically dark green or dark brown in color.
   • Causes of Color:
     • The dark color is likely due to the presence of matrix components that differ from those found in supragingival calculus.
     • It is influenced by iron heme pigments that are associated with the bleeding of inflamed gingiva, reflecting the inflammatory state of the periodontal tissues.

2. Formation Factors:

   • Matrix Components: The subgingival calculus matrix contains blood products, which contribute to its darker coloration.
   • Bacterial Environment: The subgingival environment is typically more anaerobic and harbors different bacterial species compared to supragingival calculus.

Supragingival Calculus

1. Formation Factors:

   • Dependence on Plaque and Saliva:
     • The degree of supragingival calculus formation is primarily influenced by the amount of bacterial plaque present and the secretion of salivary glands.
     • Increased plaque accumulation leads to greater calculus formation.

2. Inorganic Components:

   • Source: The inorganic components of supragingival calculus are mainly derived from saliva.
   • Composition: These components include minerals such as calcium and phosphate, which contribute to the calcification process of plaque.

Comparison of Inorganic Components

• Supragingival Calculus:

  • Inorganic components are primarily sourced from saliva, which contains minerals that facilitate the formation of calculus on the tooth surface.

• Subgingival Calculus:

  • In contrast, the inorganic components of subgingival calculus are derived mainly from crevicular fluid (serum transudate), which seeps into the gingival sulcus and contains various proteins and minerals from the bloodstream.

Junctional Epithelium

The junctional epithelium (JE) is a critical component of the periodontal tissue, playing a vital role in the attachment of the gingiva to the tooth surface. Understanding its structure, function, and development is essential for comprehending periodontal health and disease.

Structure of the Junctional Epithelium

1. Composition:

   • The junctional epithelium consists of a collar-like band of stratified squamous non-keratinized epithelium.
   • This type of epithelium is designed to provide a barrier while allowing for some flexibility and permeability.

2. Layer Thickness:

   • In early life, the junctional epithelium is approximately 3-4 layers thick.
   • As a person ages, the number of epithelial layers can increase significantly, reaching 10 to 20 layers in older individuals.
   • This increase in thickness may be a response to various factors, including mechanical stress and inflammation.

3. Length:

   • The length of the junctional epithelium typically ranges from 0.25 mm to 1.35 mm.
   • This length can vary based on individual anatomy and periodontal health.

Development of the Junctional Epithelium

• The junctional epithelium is formed by the confluence of the oral epithelium and the reduced enamel epithelium during the process of tooth eruption.
• This fusion is crucial for establishing the attachment of the gingiva to the tooth surface, creating a seal that helps protect the underlying periodontal tissues from microbial invasion.

Function of the Junctional Epithelium

• Barrier Function: The junctional epithelium serves as a barrier between the oral cavity and the underlying periodontal tissues, helping to prevent the entry of pathogens.
• Attachment: It provides a strong attachment to the tooth surface, which is essential for maintaining periodontal health.
• Regenerative Capacity: The junctional epithelium has a high turnover rate, allowing it to regenerate quickly in response to injury or inflammation.

Clinical Relevance

• Periodontal Disease: Changes in the structure and function of the junctional epithelium can be indicative of periodontal disease. For example, inflammation can lead to increased permeability and loss of attachment.
• Healing and Repair: Understanding the properties of the junctional epithelium is important for developing effective treatments for periodontal disease and for managing healing after periodontal surgery.

Assessing New Attachment in Periodontal Therapy

Assessing new attachment following periodontal therapy is crucial for evaluating treatment outcomes and understanding the healing process. However, various methods of assessment have limitations that must be considered. This lecture will discuss the reliability of different assessment methods for new attachment, including periodontal probing, radiographic analysis, and histologic methods.

1. Periodontal Probing

• Assessment Method: Periodontal probing is commonly used to measure probing depth and attachment levels before and after therapy.

• Limitations:

  • Coronal Positioning of Probe Tip: After therapy, when the inflammatory lesion is resolved, the probe tip may stop coronal to the apical termination of the epithelium. This can lead to misleading interpretations of attachment gain.
  • Infrabony Defects: Following treatment of infrabony defects, new bone may form so close to the tooth surface that the probe cannot penetrate. This can result in a false impression of improved attachment levels.
  • Interpretation of Results: A gain in probing attachment level does not necessarily indicate a true gain of connective tissue attachment. Instead, it may reflect improved health of the surrounding tissues, which increases resistance to probe penetration.

2. Radiographic Analysis and Reentry Operations

• Assessment Method: Radiographic analysis involves comparing radiographs taken before and after therapy to evaluate changes in bone levels. Reentry operations allow for direct inspection of the treated area.

• Limitations:

  • Bone Fill vs. New Attachment: While radiographs can provide evidence of new bone formation (bone fill), they do not document the formation of new root cementum or a new periodontal ligament. Therefore, radiographic evidence alone cannot confirm the establishment of new attachment.

3. Histologic Methods

• Assessment Method: Histologic analysis involves examining tissue samples under a microscope to assess the formation of new attachment, including new cementum and periodontal ligament.

• Advantages:

  • Validity: Histologic methods are considered the only valid approach to assess the formation of new attachment accurately.

• Limitations:

  • Pre-Therapy Assessment: Accurate assessment of the attachment level prior to therapy is essential for histologic analysis. If the initial attachment level cannot be determined with certainty, it may compromise the validity of the findings.

Stippling of the Gingiva

• Stippling refers to the textured surface of the gingiva that resembles the skin of an orange. This characteristic is best observed when the gingiva is dried.

• Characteristics:

  • Location:
    • The attached gingiva is typically stippled, while the marginal gingiva is not.
    • The central portion of the interdental gingiva may exhibit stippling, but its marginal borders are usually smooth.
  • Surface Variation:
    • Stippling is generally less prominent on the lingual surfaces compared to the facial surfaces and may be absent in some individuals.
  • Age-Related Changes:
    • Stippling is absent in infancy, begins to appear around 5 years of age, increases until adulthood, and may start to disappear in old age.

Attached Gingiva

• Definition: The attached gingiva is the portion of the gingiva that is firmly bound to the underlying alveolar bone and extends from the free gingival groove to the mucogingival junction, where it meets the alveolar mucosa.

• Characteristics:

  • Structure:
    • The attached gingiva is classified as a mucoperiosteum, tightly bound to the underlying alveolar bone.
  • Width:
    • The width of the attached gingiva is greatest in the incisor region, measuring approximately:
      • 3.5 – 4.5 mm in the maxilla
      • 3.3 – 3.9 mm in the mandible
    • It is narrower in the posterior segments, measuring about:
      • 1.9 mm in the maxillary first premolars
      • 1.8 mm in the mandibular first premolars.
  • Histological Features:
    • The attached gingiva is thick and keratinized (or parakeratinized) and is classified as masticatory mucosa.
    • Masticatory mucosa is characterized by a keratinized epithelium and a thick lamina propria, providing resistance to mechanical forces.

Masticatory vs. Lining Mucosa

• Masticatory Mucosa:

  • Found in areas subject to high compression and friction, such as the gingiva and hard palate.
  • Characterized by keratinized epithelium and a thick lamina propria, making it resistant to masticatory forces.

• Lining Mucosa:

  • Mobile, distensible, and non-keratinized.
  • Found in areas such as the lips, cheeks, alveolus, floor of the mouth, ventral surface of the tongue, and soft palate.

• Specialized Mucosa:

  • Found on the dorsum of the tongue, adapted for specific functions such as taste.

Desquamative Gingivitis

• Characteristics: Desquamative gingivitis is characterized by intense erythema, desquamation, and ulceration of both free and attached gingiva.
• Associated Diseases:
  • Lichen Planus
  • Pemphigus
  • Pemphigoid
  • Linear IgA Disease
  • Chronic Ulcerative Stomatitis
  • Epidermolysis Bullosa
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
  • Dermatitis Herpetiformis

Dark Field Microscopy in Periodontal Microbiology

Dark field microscopy and phase contrast microscopy are valuable techniques in microbiological studies, particularly in the field of periodontal research. These methods allow for the direct observation of bacteria in plaque samples, providing insights into their morphology and motility. This lecture will discuss the principles of dark field microscopy, its applications in periodontal disease assessment, and its limitations.

Dark Field Microscopy

• Definition: Dark field microscopy is a technique that enhances the contrast of unstained, transparent specimens, allowing for the visualization of live microorganisms in their natural state.
• Principle: The method uses a special condenser that directs light at an angle, creating a dark background against which the specimen appears bright. This allows for the observation of motility and morphology without the need for staining.

Applications in Periodontal Microbiology

1. Alternative to Culture Methods:

   • Dark field microscopy has been suggested as a rapid alternative to traditional culture methods for assessing bacterial populations in periodontal plaque samples. It allows for immediate observation of bacteria without the time-consuming process of culturing.

2. Assessment of Morphology and Motility:

   • The technique enables direct and rapid assessment of the morphology (shape and structure) and motility (movement) of bacteria present in plaque samples. This information can be crucial for understanding the dynamics of periodontal disease.

3. Indication of Periodontal Disease Status:

   • Dark field microscopy has been used to indicate the status of periodontal disease and the effectiveness of maintenance programs. By observing the presence and activity of specific bacteria, clinicians can gain insights into the health of periodontal tissues.

Limitations of Dark Field Microscopy

1. Analysis of Major Periodontal Pathogens:

   • While dark field microscopy can visualize motile bacteria, it is important to note that many major periodontal pathogens, such as Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides forsythus, Eikenella corrodens, and Eubacterium species, are motile. However, the technique may not provide detailed information about their specific characteristics or pathogenic potential.

2. Differentiation of Treponema Species:

   • Dark field microscopy cannot differentiate between species of Treponema, which is a limitation when identifying specific pathogens associated with periodontal disease. This lack of specificity can hinder the ability to tailor treatment based on the exact microbial profile.

3. Limited Quantitative Analysis:

   • While dark field microscopy allows for qualitative observations, it may not provide quantitative data on bacterial populations, which can be important for assessing disease severity and treatment outcomes.