Angle's Classification of Malocclusion

Developed by Dr. Edward Angle in the early 20th century, this classification is based on the relationship of the first molars and the canines. It is divided into three main classes:

Class I Malocclusion (Normal Occlusion)

• Description: The first molars are in a normal relationship, with the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar fitting into the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar. The canines also have a normal relationship.
• Characteristics:
  • The dental arches are aligned.
  • There may be crowding, spacing, or other dental irregularities, but the overall molar relationship is normal.

Class II Malocclusion (Distocclusion)

• Description: The first molars are positioned such that the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar is positioned more than one cusp width ahead of the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar.
• Subdivisions:
  • Class II Division 1: Characterized by protruded maxillary incisors and a deep overbite.
  • Class II Division 2: Characterized by retroclined maxillary incisors and a deep overbite, often with a normal or reduced overjet.
• Characteristics: This class often results in an overbite and can lead to aesthetic concerns.

Class III Malocclusion (Mesioocclusion)

• Description: The first molars are positioned such that the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar is positioned more than one cusp width behind the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar.
• Characteristics:
  • This class is often associated with an underbite, where the lower teeth are positioned more forward than the upper teeth.
  • It can lead to functional issues and aesthetic concerns.

2. Skeletal Classification

In addition to Angle's classification, malocclusion can also be classified based on skeletal relationships, which consider the position of the maxilla and mandible in relation to each other. This classification is particularly useful in assessing the underlying skeletal discrepancies that may contribute to malocclusion.

Class I Skeletal Relationship

• Description: The maxilla and mandible are in a normal relationship, similar to Class I malocclusion in Angle's classification.
• Characteristics: The skeletal bases are well-aligned, but there may still be dental irregularities.

Class II Skeletal Relationship

• Description: The mandible is positioned further back relative to the maxilla, similar to Class II malocclusion.
• Characteristics: This can be due to a retruded mandible or an overdeveloped maxilla.

Class III Skeletal Relationship

• Description: The mandible is positioned further forward relative to the maxilla, similar to Class III malocclusion.
• Characteristics: This can be due to a protruded mandible or a retruded maxilla.

3. Other Classifications

In addition to Angle's and skeletal classifications, malocclusion can also be described based on specific characteristics:

• Overbite: The vertical overlap of the upper incisors over the lower incisors. It can be classified as:

  • Normal Overbite: Approximately 1-2 mm of overlap.
  • Deep Overbite: Excessive overlap, which can lead to impaction of the lower incisors.
  • Open Bite: Lack of vertical overlap, where the upper and lower incisors do not touch.

• Overjet: The horizontal distance between the labioincisal edge of the upper incisors and the linguoincisal edge of the lower incisors. It can be classified as:

  • Normal Overjet: Approximately 2-4 mm.
  • Increased Overjet: Greater than 4 mm, often associated with Class II malocclusion.
  • Decreased Overjet: Less than 2 mm, often associated with Class III malocclusion.

• Crossbite: A condition where one or more of the upper teeth bite on the inside of the lower teeth. It can be:

  • Anterior Crossbite: Involves the front teeth.
  • Posterior Crossbite: Involves the back teeth.

Mixed Dentition Analysis: Tanaka & Johnson Analysis

 This analysis is crucial for predicting the size of unerupted permanent teeth based on the measurements of erupted teeth, which is particularly useful in orthodontics.

Mixed Dentition Analysis

Mixed dentition refers to the period when both primary and permanent teeth are present in the mouth. Accurate predictions of the size of unerupted teeth during this phase are essential for effective orthodontic treatment planning.

Proportional Equation Prediction Method

When most canines and premolars have erupted, and one or two succedaneous teeth are still unerupted, the proportional equation prediction method can be employed. This method allows for estimating the mesiodistal width of unerupted permanent teeth.

Procedure for Proportional Equation Prediction Method

1. Measurement of Teeth:

   • Measure the width of the unerupted tooth and an erupted tooth on the same periapical radiograph.
   • Measure the width of the erupted tooth on a plaster cast.

2. Establishing Proportions:

   • These three measurements form a proportion that can be solved to estimate the width of the unerupted tooth on the cast.

Formula Used

The following formula is utilized to calculate the width of the unerupted tooth:

[ Y_1 = \frac{X_1 \times Y_2}{X_2} ]

Where:

• Y1 = Width of the unerupted tooth whose measurement is to be determined.
• Y2 = Width of the unerupted tooth as seen on the radiograph.
• X1 = Width of the erupted tooth, measured on the plaster cast.
• X2 = Width of the erupted tooth, measured on the radiograph.

Application of the Analysis

This method is particularly useful in orthodontic assessments, allowing practitioners to predict the size of unerupted teeth accurately. By using the measurements of erupted teeth, orthodontists can make informed decisions regarding space management and treatment planning.

Angle’s Classification of Malocclusion

Malocclusion refers to the misalignment or incorrect relationship between the teeth of the two dental arches when they come into contact as the jaws close. Understanding occlusion is essential for diagnosing and treating orthodontic issues.

Definitions

• Occlusion: The contact between the teeth in the mandibular arch and those in the maxillary arch during functional relations (Wheeler’s definition).
• Malocclusion: A condition characterized by a deflection from the normal relation of the teeth to other teeth in the same arch and/or to teeth in the opposing arch (Gardiner, White & Leighton).

Importance of Classification

Classifying malocclusion serves several purposes:

• Grouping of Orthodontic Problems: Helps in identifying and categorizing various orthodontic issues.
• Location of Problems: Aids in pinpointing specific areas that require treatment.
• Diagnosis and Treatment Planning: Facilitates the development of effective treatment strategies.
• Self-Communication: Provides a standardized language for orthodontists to discuss cases.
• Documentation: Useful for recording and tracking orthodontic problems.
• Epidemiological Studies: Assists in research and studies related to malocclusion prevalence.
• Assessment of Treatment Effects: Evaluates the effectiveness of orthodontic appliances.

Normal Occlusion

Molar Relationship

According to Angle, normal occlusion is defined by the relationship of the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar aligning with the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar.

Angle’s Classification of Malocclusion

Edward Angle, known as the father of modern orthodontics, first published his classification in 1899. The classification is based on the relationship of the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar to the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar. It is divided into three classes:

Class I Malocclusion (Neutrocclusion)

• Definition: Normal molar relationship is present, but there may be crowding, misalignment, rotations, cross-bites, and other irregularities.
• Characteristics:
  • Molar relationship is normal.
  • Teeth may be crowded or rotated.
  • Other alignment irregularities may be present.

Class II Malocclusion (Distocclusion)

• Definition: The lower molar is positioned distal to the upper molar.
• Characteristics:
  • Often results in a retrognathic facial profile.
  • Increased overjet and overbite.
  • The mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar occludes anterior to the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar.

Subdivisions of Class II Malocclusion:

1. Class II Division 1:
   • Class II molars with normally inclined or proclined maxillary central incisors.
2. Class II Division 2:
   • Class II molars with retroclined maxillary central incisors.

Class III Malocclusion (Mesiocclusion)

• Definition: The lower molar is positioned mesial to the upper molar.
• Characteristics:
  • Often results in a prognathic facial profile.
  • Anterior crossbite and negative overjet (underbite).
  • The mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first molar falls posterior to the buccal groove of the lower first molar.

Advantages of Angle’s Classification

• Comprehensive: It is the first comprehensive classification and is widely accepted in the field of orthodontics.
• Simplicity: The classification is straightforward and easy to use.
• Popularity: It is the most popular classification system among orthodontists.
• Effective Communication: Facilitates clear communication regarding malocclusion.

Disadvantages of Angle’s Classification

• Limited Plane Consideration: It primarily considers malocclusion in the anteroposterior plane, neglecting transverse and vertical dimensions.
• Fixed Reference Point: The first molar is considered a fixed point, which may not be applicable in all cases.
• Not Applicable for Deciduous Dentition: The classification does not effectively address malocclusion in children with primary teeth.
• Lack of Distinction: It does not differentiate between skeletal and dental malocclusion.

Lip habits refer to various behaviors involving the lips that can affect oral health, facial aesthetics, and dental alignment. These habits can include lip biting, lip sucking, lip licking, and lip pursing. While some lip habits may be benign, others can lead to dental and orthodontic issues if they persist over time.

Common Types of Lip Habits

1. Lip Biting:

   • Description: Involves the habitual biting of the lips, which can lead to chapped, sore, or damaged lips.
   • Causes: Often associated with stress, anxiety, or nervousness. It can also be a response to boredom or concentration.

2. Lip Sucking:

   • Description: The act of sucking on the lips, similar to thumb sucking, which can lead to changes in dental alignment.
   • Causes: Often seen in young children as a self-soothing mechanism. It can also occur in response to anxiety or stress.

3. Lip Licking:

   • Description: Habitual licking of the lips, which can lead to dryness and irritation.
   • Causes: Often a response to dry lips or a habit formed during stressful situations.

4. Lip Pursing:

   • Description: The act of tightly pressing the lips together, which can lead to muscle tension and discomfort.
   • Causes: Often associated with anxiety or concentration.

Etiology of Lip Habits

• Psychological Factors: Many lip habits are linked to emotional states such as stress, anxiety, or boredom. Children may develop these habits as coping mechanisms.
• Oral Environment: Factors such as dry lips, dental issues, or malocclusion can contribute to the development of lip habits.
• Developmental Factors: Young children may engage in lip habits as part of their exploration of their bodies and the world around them.

Clinical Features

• Dental Effects:

  • Malocclusion: Prolonged lip habits can lead to changes in dental alignment, including open bites, overbites, or other malocclusions.
  • Tooth Wear: Lip biting can lead to wear on the incisal edges of the teeth.
  • Gum Recession: Chronic lip habits may contribute to gum recession or irritation.

• Soft Tissue Changes:

  • Chapped or Cracked Lips: Frequent lip licking or biting can lead to dry, chapped, or cracked lips.
  • Calluses: In some cases, calluses may develop on the lips due to repeated biting or sucking.

• Facial Aesthetics:

  • Changes in Lip Shape: Prolonged habits can lead to changes in the shape and appearance of the lips.
  • Facial Muscle Tension: Lip habits may contribute to muscle tension in the face, leading to discomfort or changes in facial expression.

Management

1. Behavioral Modification:

   • Awareness Training: Educating the individual about their lip habits and encouraging them to become aware of when they occur.
   • Positive Reinforcement: Encouraging the individual to replace the habit with a more positive behavior, such as using lip balm for dry lips.

2. Psychological Support:

   • Counseling: For individuals whose lip habits are linked to anxiety or stress, counseling or therapy may be beneficial.
   • Relaxation Techniques: Teaching relaxation techniques to help manage stress and reduce the urge to engage in lip habits.

3. Oral Appliances:

   • In some cases, orthodontic appliances may be used to discourage lip habits, particularly if they are leading to malocclusion or other dental issues.

4. Dental Care:

   • Regular Check-Ups: Regular dental visits can help monitor the effects of lip habits on oral health and provide guidance on management.
   • Treatment of Dental Issues: Addressing any underlying dental problems, such as cavities or misalignment, can help reduce the urge to engage in lip habits.

Functional Matrix Hypothesis is a concept in orthodontics and craniofacial biology that explains how the growth and development of the craniofacial complex (including the skull, face, and dental structures) are influenced by functional demands and environmental factors rather than solely by genetic factors. This hypothesis was proposed by Dr. Robert A. K. McNamara and is based on the idea that the functional matrices—such as muscles, soft tissues, and functional activities (like chewing and speaking)—play a crucial role in shaping the skeletal structures.

Concepts of the Functional Matrix Hypothesis

1. Functional Matrices:

   • The hypothesis posits that the growth of the craniofacial skeleton is guided by the functional matrices surrounding it. These matrices include:
     • Muscles: The muscles of mastication, facial expression, and other soft tissues exert forces on the bones, influencing their growth and development.
     • Soft Tissues: The presence and tension of soft tissues, such as the lips, cheeks, and tongue, can affect the position and growth of the underlying skeletal structures.
     • Functional Activities: Activities such as chewing, swallowing, and speaking create functional demands that influence the growth patterns of the craniofacial complex.

2. Growth and Development:

   • According to the Functional Matrix Hypothesis, the growth of the craniofacial skeleton is not a direct result of genetic programming but is instead a response to the functional demands placed on it. This means that changes in function can lead to changes in growth patterns.
   • For example, if a child has a habit of mouth breathing, the lack of proper nasal function can lead to altered growth of the maxilla and mandible, resulting in malocclusion or other dental issues.

3. Orthodontic Implications:

   • The Functional Matrix Hypothesis has significant implications for orthodontic treatment and craniofacial orthopedics. It suggests that:
     • Functional Appliances: Orthodontic appliances that modify function (such as functional appliances) can be used to influence the growth of the jaws and improve occlusion.
     • Early Intervention: Early orthodontic intervention may be beneficial in guiding the growth of the craniofacial complex, especially in children, to prevent or correct malocclusions.
     • Holistic Approach: Treatment should consider not only the teeth and jaws but also the surrounding soft tissues and functional activities.

4. Clinical Applications:

   • The Functional Matrix Hypothesis encourages clinicians to assess the functional aspects of a patient's oral and facial structures when planning treatment. This includes evaluating muscle function, soft tissue relationships, and the impact of habits (such as thumb sucking or mouth breathing) on growth and development.

Retention

Definition: Retention refers to the phase following active orthodontic treatment where appliances are used to maintain the corrected positions of the teeth. The goal of retention is to prevent relapse and ensure that the teeth remain in their new, desired positions.

Types of Retainers

1. Fixed Retainers:

   • Description: These are bonded to the lingual surfaces of the teeth, typically the anterior teeth, to maintain their positions.
   • Advantages: They provide continuous retention without requiring patient compliance.
   • Disadvantages: They can make oral hygiene more challenging and may require periodic replacement.

2. Removable Retainers:

   • Description: These are appliances that can be taken out by the patient. Common types include:
     • Hawley Retainer: A custom-made acrylic plate with a wire framework that holds the teeth in position.
     • Essix Retainer: A clear, plastic retainer that fits over the teeth, providing a more aesthetic option.
   • Advantages: Easier to clean and can be removed for eating and oral hygiene.
   • Disadvantages: Their effectiveness relies on patient compliance; if not worn as prescribed, relapse may occur.

Duration of Retention

• The duration of retention varies based on individual cases, but it is generally recommended to wear retainers full-time for a period (often several months to a year) and then transition to nighttime wear for an extended period (often several years).
• Long-term retention may be necessary for some patients, especially those with a history of dental movement or specific malocclusions.