Talk to us?

- NEETMDS- courses
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Mandibular Tori

Mandibular tori are bony growths that occur on the mandible, typically on the lingual aspect of the alveolar ridge. While they are often asymptomatic, there are specific indications for their removal, particularly when they interfere with oral function or prosthetic rehabilitation.

Indications for Removal

  1. Interference with Denture Construction:

    • Mandibular tori may obstruct the proper fitting of full or partial dentures, necessitating their removal to ensure adequate retention and comfort.
  2. Ulceration and Slow Healing:

    • If the mucosal covering over the torus ulcerates and the wound exhibits extremely slow healing, surgical intervention may be required to promote healing and prevent further complications.
  3. Interference with Speech and Deglutition:

    • Large tori that impede normal speech or swallowing may warrant removal to improve the patient's quality of life and functional abilities.

Surgical Technique

  1. Incision Placement:

    • The incision should be made on the crest of the ridge if the patient is edentulous (without teeth). This approach allows for better access to the torus while minimizing trauma to surrounding tissues.
    • If there are teeth present in the area, the incision should be made along the gingival margin. This helps to preserve the integrity of the gingival tissue and maintain aesthetics.
  2. Avoiding Direct Incision Over the Torus:

    • It is crucial not to make the incision directly over the torus. Incising over the torus can lead to:
      • Status Line: Leaving a visible line on the traumatized bone, which can affect aesthetics and function.
      • Thin Mucosa: The mucosa over the torus is generally very thin, and an incision through it can result in dehiscence (wound separation) and exposure of the underlying bone, complicating healing.
  3. Surgical Procedure:

    • After making the appropriate incision, the mucosal flap is elevated to expose the underlying bone.
    • The torus is then carefully removed using appropriate surgical instruments, ensuring minimal trauma to surrounding tissues.
    • Hemostasis is achieved, and the mucosal flap is repositioned and sutured back into place.
  4. Postoperative Care:

    • Patients may experience discomfort and swelling following the procedure, which can be managed with analgesics.
    • Instructions for oral hygiene and dietary modifications may be provided to promote healing and prevent complications.
  5. Follow-Up:

    • Regular follow-up appointments are necessary to monitor healing and assess for any potential complications, such as infection or delayed healing.

Condylar Fractures

Condylar fractures are a significant type of mandibular fracture, accounting for a notable percentage of all mandibular injuries. Understanding their characteristics, associated injuries, and implications for treatment is essential for effective management. Below is a detailed overview of condylar fractures.

1. Prevalence and Associated Injuries

  • Incidence: Condylar fractures account for 26-57% of all mandibular fractures.
  • Associated Fractures: Approximately 48-66% of patients with a condylar fracture will also have a fracture of the body or angle of the mandible.
  • Unilateral Fractures: Unilateral fractures of the condyle occur 84% of the time.

2. Types of Condylar Fractures

  • Subcondylar Fractures: Approximately 62% of condylar fractures are classified as subcondylar.
  • Condylar Neck Fractures: About 24% are neck fractures.
  • Intracapsular Fractures: Approximately 14% are intracapsular.
  • Severe Displacement: About 16% of condylar fractures are associated with severe displacement.

3. Mechanism of Injury

  • Bilateral Fractures: Symmetrical impacts can cause bilateral fractures, with contralateral fractures occurring due to shearing forces, which are thought to produce intracapsular fractures.

4. Displacement Patterns

  • Dislocation: The condylar fragment can dislocate out of the fossa, typically in an anterior direction, but it can also displace in any direction.

5. Clinical Implications of Fractures

  • Unilateral Fractures: A unilateral fracture with sufficient fragment overlap or dislocation can lead to premature posterior contact on the affected side and midline deviation toward the affected side.
  • Bilateral Fractures: Bilateral condylar fractures with fragment overlap or dislocation can result in bilateral posterior premature contact, anterior open bite, and minimal or no chin deviation.

6. Comminuted Fractures

  • Challenges: Comminuted mandibular fractures with bilateral condylar fractures can produce crossbites and increase the interangular distance, complicating accurate reduction. Failure to recognize and correct this increased interangular distance can lead to malocclusion after fixation.

7. Radiologic Imaging

  • Imaging Requirements: Radiologic imaging in two planes is necessary to diagnose condylar fractures effectively. Commonly used imaging techniques include:
    • Orthopantomogram (OPG): Provides a panoramic view of the mandible and can help identify fractures.
    • Posteroanterior (PA) Mandible View: Offers additional detail and perspective on the fracture.

Surgical Gut (Catgut)

Surgical gut, commonly known as catgut, is a type of absorbable suture material derived from the intestines of animals, primarily sheep and cattle. It has been widely used in surgical procedures due to its unique properties, although it has certain limitations. Below is a detailed overview of surgical gut, including its composition, properties, mechanisms of absorption, and clinical applications.

Composition and Preparation

  • Source: Surgical gut is prepared from:

    • Submucosa of Sheep Small Intestine: This layer is rich in collagen, which is essential for the strength and absorbability of the suture.
    • Serosal Layer of Cattle Small Intestine: This layer also provides collagen and is used in the production of surgical gut.
  • Collagen Content: The primary component of surgical gut is collagen, which is treated with formaldehyde to enhance its properties. This treatment helps stabilize the collagen structure and prolongs the suture's strength.

  • Suture Characteristics:

    • Multifilament Structure: Surgical gut is a capillary multifilament suture, meaning it consists of multiple strands that can absorb fluids, which can be beneficial in certain surgical contexts.
    • Smooth Surface: The sutures are machine-ground and polished to yield a relatively smooth surface, resembling that of monofilament sutures.

Sterilization

  • Sterilization Methods:

    • Ionizing Radiation: Surgical gut is typically sterilized using ionizing radiation, which effectively kills pathogens without denaturing the protein structure of the collagen.
    • Ethylene Oxide: This method can also be used for sterilization, and it prolongs the absorption time of the suture, making it suitable for specific applications.
  • Limitations of Autoclaving: Autoclaving is not suitable for surgical gut because it denatures the protein, leading to a significant loss of tensile strength.

Mechanism of Absorption

The absorption of surgical gut after implantation occurs through a twofold mechanism primarily involving macrophages:

  1. Molecular Bond Cleavage:

    • Acid hydrolytic and collagenolytic activities cleave the molecular bonds in the collagen structure of the suture.
  2. Digestion and Absorption:

    • Proteolytic enzymes further digest the collagen, leading to the gradual absorption of the suture material.
  • Foreign Body Reaction: Due to its collagenous composition, surgical gut stimulates a significant foreign body reaction in the implanted tissue, which can lead to inflammation.

Rate of Absorption and Loss of Tensile Strength

  • Variability: The rate of absorption and loss of tensile strength varies depending on the implantation site and the surrounding tissue environment.

  • Premature Absorption: Factors that can lead to premature absorption include:

    • Exposure to gastric secretions.
    • Presence of infection.
    • Highly vascularized tissues.
    • Conditions in protein-depleted patients.
  • Strength Loss Timeline:

    • Medium chromic gut loses about 33% of its original strength after 7 days of implantation and about 67% after 28 days.

Types of Surgical Gut

  1. Plain Gut:

    • Characteristics: Produces a severe tissue reaction and loses tensile strength rapidly, making it less useful in surgical applications.
    • Applications: Limited due to its inflammatory response and quick absorption.
  2. Chromic Gut:

    • Treatment: Treated with chromium salts to increase tensile strength and resistance to digestion while decreasing tissue reactivity.
    • Advantages: Provides a more controlled absorption rate and is more suitable for surgical use compared to plain gut.

Handling Characteristics

  • Good Handling: Surgical gut generally exhibits good handling characteristics, allowing for easy manipulation during surgical procedures.
  • Weakness When Wet: It swells and weakens when wet, which can affect knot security and overall performance during surgery.

Disadvantages

  • Intense Inflammatory Reaction: Surgical gut can provoke a significant inflammatory response, which may complicate healing.
  • Variability in Strength Loss: The unpredictable rate of loss of tensile strength can be a concern in surgical applications.
  • Capillarity: The multifilament structure can absorb fluids, which may lead to increased tissue reaction and complications.
  • Sensitivity Reactions: Some patients, particularly cats, may experience sensitivity reactions to surgical gut.

Clinical Applications

  • Use in Surgery: Surgical gut is used in various surgical procedures, particularly in soft tissue closures where absorbable sutures are preferred.
  • Adhesion Formation: The use of surgical gut is generally unwarranted in situations where adhesion formation is desired due to its inflammatory properties.

Management of Nasal Complex Fractures

Nasal complex fractures involve injuries to the nasal bones and surrounding structures, including the nasal septum, maxilla, and sometimes the orbits. Proper management is crucial to restore function and aesthetics.

Anesthesia Considerations

  • Local Anesthesia:
    • Nasal complex fractures can be reduced under local anesthesia, which may be sufficient for less complicated cases or when the patient is cooperative.
  • General Anesthesia:
    • For more complex fractures or when significant manipulation of the nasal structures is required, general anesthesia is preferred.
    • Per-oral Endotracheal Tube: This method allows for better airway management and control during the procedure.
    • Throat Pack: A throat pack is often used to minimize the risk of aspiration and to manage any potential hemorrhage, which can be profuse in these cases.

Surgical Technique

  1. Reduction of Fractures:

    • The primary goal is to realign the fractured nasal bones and restore the normal anatomy of the nasal complex.
    • Manipulation of Fragments:
      • Walsham’s Forceps: These are specialized instruments used to grasp and manipulate the nasal bone fragments during reduction.
      • Asche’s Forceps: Another type of forceps that can be used for similar purposes, allowing for precise control over the fractured segments.
  2. Post-Reduction Care:

    • After the reduction, the nasal structures may be stabilized using splints or packing to maintain alignment during the healing process.
    • Monitoring for complications such as bleeding, infection, or airway obstruction is essential.

Visor Osteotomy

Visor osteotomy is a surgical procedure primarily aimed at increasing the height of the mandibular ridge to enhance denture support. This technique is particularly beneficial for patients with resorbed or atrophic mandibles, where the lack of adequate bone height can compromise the retention and stability of dentures.

Goals of Visor Osteotomy

  • Increase Mandibular Ridge Height: The primary objective is to augment the height of the mandibular ridge, providing a more favorable foundation for denture placement.
  • Improve Denture Support: By increasing the ridge height, the procedure aims to enhance the retention and stability of dentures, leading to improved function and patient satisfaction.

Procedure Overview

  1. Incision and Exposure:

    • A surgical incision is made in the oral mucosa to expose the mandible.
    • The incision is typically placed along the vestibular area to minimize scarring and optimize healing.
  2. Central Splitting of the Mandible:

    • The mandible is carefully split in the buccolingual dimension. This involves creating a central osteotomy that divides the mandible into two sections.
    • The split allows for manipulation of the bone segments to achieve the desired height.
  3. Superior Positioning of the Lingual Section:

    • The lingual section of the mandible is then repositioned superiorly. This elevation is crucial for increasing the height of the ridge.
    • The repositioned segment is stabilized using wires or other fixation devices to maintain the new position during the healing process.
  4. Bone Grafting:

    • Cancellous bone graft material is placed at the outer cortex over the superior labial junction. This grafting material helps to improve the contour of the mandible and provides additional support for the overlying soft tissues.
    • The use of bone grafts can enhance the healing process and promote new bone formation in the area.
  5. Closure:

    • The surgical site is closed in layers, ensuring that the mucosa and underlying tissues are properly approximated.
    • Postoperative care instructions are provided to the patient to facilitate healing and minimize complications.

Indications

  • Atrophic Mandible: Patients with significant bone resorption in the mandible, often seen in edentulous individuals, are prime candidates for this procedure.
  • Denture Retention Issues: Individuals experiencing difficulties with denture retention and stability due to inadequate ridge height may benefit from visor osteotomy.

Benefits

  • Enhanced Denture Support: By increasing the height of the mandibular ridge, patients can achieve better retention and stability of their dentures.
  • Improved Aesthetics: The procedure can also enhance the facial contour, contributing to improved aesthetics for the patient.
  • Functional Improvement: Patients may experience improved chewing function and overall quality of life following the procedure.

Considerations and Risks

  • Surgical Risks: As with any surgical procedure, there are risks involved, including infection, bleeding, and complications related to anesthesia.
  • Healing Time: Patients should be informed about the expected healing time and the importance of following postoperative care instructions.
  • Follow-Up: Regular follow-up appointments are necessary to monitor healing and assess the need for any adjustments to dentures.

Ludwig's Angina

Ludwig's angina is a serious, potentially life-threatening cellulitis or connective tissue infection of the submandibular space. It is characterized by bilateral swelling of the submandibular and sublingual areas, which can lead to airway obstruction. The condition is named after the German physician Wilhelm Friedrich Ludwig, who provided a classic description of the disease in the early 19th century.

Historical Background

  • Coining of the Term: The term "Ludwig's angina" was first coined by Camerer in 1837, who presented cases that included a classic description of the condition. The name honors W.F. Ludwig, who had described the features of the disease in the previous year.

  • Etymology:

    • The word "angina" is derived from the Latin word "angere," which means "to suffocate" or "to choke." This reflects the potential for airway compromise associated with the condition.
    • The name "Ludwig" recognizes the contributions of Wilhelm Friedrich Ludwig to the understanding of this medical entity.
  • Ludwig's Personal Connection: Interestingly, Ludwig himself died of throat inflammation in 1865, which underscores the severity of infections in the head and neck region.

Clinical Features

Ludwig's angina typically presents with the following features:

  1. Bilateral Swelling: The most characteristic sign is bilateral swelling of the submandibular area, which can extend to the sublingual space. This swelling may cause the floor of the mouth to elevate.

  2. Pain and Tenderness: Patients often experience pain and tenderness in the affected area, which may worsen with movement or swallowing.

  3. Dysphagia and Dysarthria: Difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) and changes in speech (dysarthria) may occur due to swelling and discomfort.

  4. Airway Compromise: As the swelling progresses, there is a risk of airway obstruction, which can be life-threatening. Patients may exhibit signs of respiratory distress.

  5. Systemic Symptoms: Fever, malaise, and other systemic signs of infection may be present.

Etiology

Ludwig's angina is most commonly caused by infections that originate from the teeth, particularly the second or third molars. The infection can spread from dental abscesses or periodontal disease into the submandibular space. The most common pathogens include:

  • Streptococcus species
  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Anaerobic bacteria

Diagnosis and Management

  • Diagnosis: Diagnosis is primarily clinical, based on the characteristic signs and symptoms. Imaging studies, such as CT scans, may be used to assess the extent of the infection and to rule out other conditions.

  • Management:

    • Airway Management: Ensuring a patent airway is the top priority, especially if there are signs of respiratory distress.
    • Antibiotic Therapy: Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics are initiated to target the likely pathogens.
    • Surgical Intervention: In cases of significant swelling or abscess formation, surgical drainage may be necessary to relieve pressure and remove infected material.

Guardsman Fracture (Parade Ground Fracture)

Definition: The Guardsman fracture, also known as the parade ground fracture, is characterized by a combination of symphyseal and bilateral condylar fractures of the mandible. This type of fracture is often associated with specific mechanisms of injury, such as direct trauma or falls.

  1. Fracture Components:

    • Symphyseal Fracture: Involves the midline of the mandible where the two halves meet.
    • Bilateral Condylar Fractures: Involves fractures of both condyles, which are the rounded ends of the mandible that articulate with the temporal bone of the skull.
  2. Mechanism of Injury:

    • Guardsman fractures typically occur due to significant trauma, such as a fall or blunt force impact, which can lead to simultaneous fractures in these areas.
  3. Clinical Implications:

    • Inadequate Fixation: If the fixation of the symphyseal fracture is inadequate, it can lead to complications such as:
      • Splaying of the Cortex: The fracture fragments may open on the lingual side, leading to a widening of the fracture site.
      • Increased Interangular Distance: The splaying effect increases the distance between the angles of the mandible, which can affect occlusion and jaw function.
  4. Symptoms:

    • Patients may present with pain, swelling, malocclusion, and difficulty in jaw movement. There may also be visible deformity or asymmetry in the jaw.
  5. Management:

    • Surgical Intervention: Proper fixation of both the symphyseal and condylar fractures is crucial. This may involve the use of plates and screws to stabilize the fractures and restore normal anatomy.

Explore by Exams