Transoral Lithotomy: Procedure for Submandibular Duct Stone Removal

Transoral lithotomy is a surgical technique used to remove stones (calculi) from the submandibular duct (Wharton's duct). This procedure is typically performed under local anesthesia and is effective for addressing sialolithiasis (the presence of stones in the salivary glands).

Procedure

1. Preoperative Preparation:

   • Radiographic Assessment: The exact location of the stone is determined using imaging studies, such as X-rays or ultrasound, to guide the surgical approach.
   • Local Anesthesia: The procedure is performed under local anesthesia to minimize discomfort for the patient.

2. Surgical Technique:

   • Suture Placement: A suture is placed behind the stone to prevent it from moving backward during the procedure, facilitating easier access.
   • Incision: An incision is made in the mucosa of the floor of the mouth, parallel to the duct. Care is taken to avoid injury to surrounding structures, including:
     • Lingual Nerve: Responsible for sensory innervation to the tongue.
     • Submandibular Gland: The gland itself should be preserved to maintain salivary function.

3. Blunt Dissection:

   • After making the incision, blunt dissection is performed to carefully displace the surrounding tissue and expose the duct.

4. Identifying the Duct:

   • The submandibular duct is located, and the segment of the duct that contains the stone is identified.

5. Stone Removal:

   • A longitudinal incision is made over the stone within the duct. The stone is then extracted using small forceps. Care is taken to ensure complete removal to prevent recurrence.

6. Postoperative Considerations:

   • After the stone is removed, the incision may be closed with sutures, and the area is monitored for any signs of complications.

Complications

• Bacterial Sialadenitis: If there is a secondary infection following the procedure, it can lead to bacterial sialadenitis, which is an inflammation of the salivary gland due to infection. Symptoms may include pain, swelling, and purulent discharge from the duct.

Induction Agents in Anesthesia

Propofol is a widely used intravenous anesthetic agent known for its rapid onset and quick recovery profile, making it particularly suitable for outpatient surgeries. It is favored for its ability to provide a clear-headed recovery with a low incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Below is a summary of preferred induction agents for various clinical situations, including the use of propofol and alternatives based on specific patient needs.

Propofol

• Use: Propofol is the agent of choice for most outpatient surgeries due to its rapid onset and quick recovery time.
• Advantages:
  • Provides a smooth induction and emergence from anesthesia.
  • Low incidence of nausea and vomiting, which is beneficial for outpatient settings.
  • Allows for quick discharge of patients after surgery.

Preferred Induction Agents in Specific Conditions

1. Neonates:

   • Agent: Sevoflurane (Inhalation)
   • Rationale: Sevoflurane is preferred for induction in neonates due to its rapid onset and minimal airway irritation. It is well-tolerated and allows for smooth induction in this vulnerable population.

2. Neurosurgery:

   • Agents: Isoflurane with Thiopentone/Propofol/Etomidate
   • Additional Consideration: Hyperventilation is often employed to maintain arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) between 25-30 mm Hg. This helps to reduce intracranial pressure and improve surgical conditions.
   • Rationale: Isoflurane is commonly used for its neuroprotective properties, while thiopentone, propofol, or etomidate can be used for induction based on the specific needs of the patient.

3. Coronary Artery Disease & Hypertension:

   • Agents: Barbiturates, Benzodiazepines, Propofol, Etomidate
   • Rationale: All these agents are considered equally safe for patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension. The choice may depend on the specific clinical scenario, patient comorbidities, and the desired depth of anesthesia.

4. Day Care Surgery:

   • Agent: Propofol
   • Rationale: Propofol is preferred for day care surgeries due to its rapid recovery profile, allowing patients to be discharged quickly after the procedure. Its low incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting further supports its use in outpatient settings.

Classification and Management of Impacted Third Molars

Impacted third molars, commonly known as wisdom teeth, can present in various orientations and depths, influencing the difficulty of their extraction. Understanding the types of impactions and their classifications is crucial for planning surgical intervention.

Types of Impaction

1. Mesioangular Impaction:

   • Description: The tooth is tilted toward the second molar in a mesial direction.
   • Prevalence: Comprises approximately 43% of all impacted teeth.
   • Difficulty: Generally acknowledged as the least difficult type of impaction to remove.

2. Vertical Impaction:

   • Description: The tooth is positioned vertically, with the crown facing upward.
   • Prevalence: Accounts for about 38% of impacted teeth.
   • Difficulty: Moderate difficulty in removal.

3. Distoangular Impaction:

   • Description: The tooth is tilted away from the second molar in a distal direction.
   • Prevalence: Comprises approximately 6% of impacted teeth.
   • Difficulty: Considered the most difficult type of impaction to remove due to the withdrawal pathway running into the mandibular ramus.

4. Horizontal Impaction:

   • Description: The tooth is positioned horizontally, with the crown facing the buccal or lingual side.
   • Prevalence: Accounts for about 3% of impacted teeth.
   • Difficulty: More difficult than mesioangular but less difficult than distoangular.

Decreasing Level of Difficulty for Types of Impaction

• Order of Difficulty:
  • Distoangular > Horizontal > Vertical > Mesioangular

Pell and Gregory Classification

The Pell and Gregory classification system categorizes impacted teeth based on their relationship to the mandibular ramus and the occlusal plane. This classification helps assess the difficulty of extraction.

Classification Based on Coverage by the Mandibular Ramus

1. Class 1:

   • Description: Mesiodistal diameter of the crown is completely anterior to the anterior border of the mandibular ramus.
   • Difficulty: Easiest to remove.

2. Class 2:

   • Description: Approximately one-half of the tooth is covered by the ramus.
   • Difficulty: Moderate difficulty.

3. Class 3:

   • Description: The tooth is completely within the mandibular ramus.
   • Difficulty: Most difficult to remove.

Decreasing Level of Difficulty for Ramus Coverage

• Order of Difficulty:
  • Class 3 > Class 2 > Class 1

Pell and Gregory Classification Based on Relationship to Occlusal Plane

This classification assesses the depth of the impacted tooth relative to the occlusal plane of the second molar.

1. Class A:

   • Description: The occlusal surface of the impacted tooth is level or nearly level with the occlusal plane of the second molar.
   • Difficulty: Easiest to remove.

2. Class B:

   • Description: The occlusal surface lies between the occlusal plane and the cervical line of the second molar.
   • Difficulty: Moderate difficulty.

3. Class C:

   • Description: The occlusal surface is below the cervical line of the second molars.
   • Difficulty: Most difficult to remove.

Decreasing Level of Difficulty for Occlusal Plane Relationship

• Order of Difficulty:
  • Class C > Class B > Class A

Summary of Extraction Difficulty

• Most Difficult Impaction:
  • Distoangular impaction with Class 3 ramus coverage and Class C depth.
• Easiest Impaction:
  • Mesioangular impaction with Class 1 ramus coverage and Class A dep

Marginal Resection

Marginal resection, also known as en bloc resection or peripheral osteotomy, is a surgical procedure used to treat locally aggressive benign lesions of the jaw. This technique involves the removal of the lesion along with a margin of surrounding bone, while preserving the continuity of the jaw.

Key Features of Marginal Resection

1. Indications:

   • Marginal resection is indicated for benign lesions with a known propensity for recurrence, such as:
     • Ameloblastoma
     • Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor
     • Myxoma
     • Ameloblastic odontoma
     • Squamous odontogenic tumor
     • Benign chondroblastoma
     • Hemangioma
   • It is also indicated for recurrent lesions that have been previously treated with enucleation alone.

2. Rationale:

   • Enucleation of locally aggressive lesions is not a safe procedure, as it can lead to recurrence. Marginal resection is a more effective approach, as it allows for the complete removal of the tumor along with a margin of surrounding bone.

3. Benefits:

   • Complete Removal of the Tumor: Marginal resection ensures the complete removal of the tumor, reducing the risk of recurrence.
   • Preservation of Jaw Continuity: This procedure allows for the preservation of jaw continuity, avoiding deformity, disfigurement, and the need for secondary cosmetic surgery and prosthetic rehabilitation.

4. Surgical Technique:

   • The procedure involves the removal of the lesion along with a margin of surrounding bone. The extent of the resection is determined by the size and location of the lesion, as well as the patient's overall health and medical history.

5. Postoperative Care:

   • Patients may experience some discomfort and swelling following the procedure, which can be managed with analgesics and anti-inflammatory medications.
   • Regular follow-up appointments are necessary to monitor the healing process and assess for any potential complications.

6. Outcomes:

   • Marginal resection is a highly effective procedure for treating locally aggressive benign lesions of the jaw. It allows for the complete removal of the tumor, while preserving jaw continuity and minimizing the risk of recurrence.