ORMOCER (Organically Modified Ceramic)

ORMOCER is a modern dental material that combines organic and inorganic components to create a versatile and effective restorative option. Introduced as a dental restorative material in 1998, ORMOCER has gained attention for its unique properties and applications in dentistry.

1. Composition of ORMOCER

ORMOCER is characterized by a complex structure that includes both organic and inorganic networks. The main components of ORMOCER are:

A. Organic Molecule Segments

• Methacrylate Groups: These segments form a highly cross-linked matrix, contributing to the material's strength and stability.

B. Inorganic Condensing Molecules

• Three-Dimensional Networks: The inorganic components are formed through inorganic polycondensation, creating a robust backbone for the ORMOCER molecules. This structure enhances the material's mechanical properties.

C. Fillers

• Additional Fillers: Fillers are incorporated into the ORMOCER matrix to improve its physical properties, such as strength and wear resistance.

2. Properties of ORMOCER

ORMOCER exhibits several advantageous properties that make it suitable for various dental applications:

1. Biocompatibility: ORMOCER is more biocompatible than conventional composites, making it a safer choice for dental restorations.

2. Higher Bond Strength: The material demonstrates superior bond strength, enhancing its adhesion to tooth structure and restorative materials.

3. Minimal Polymerization Shrinkage: ORMOCER has the least polymerization shrinkage among resin-based filling materials, reducing the risk of gaps and microleakage.

4. Aesthetic Qualities: The material is highly aesthetic and can be matched to the natural color of teeth, making it suitable for cosmetic applications.

5. Mechanical Strength: ORMOCER exhibits high compressive strength (410 MPa) and transverse strength (143 MPa), providing durability and resistance to fracture.

3. Indications for Use

ORMOCER is indicated for a variety of dental applications, including:

1. Restorations for All Types of Preparations: ORMOCER can be used for direct and indirect restorations in various cavity preparations.

2. Aesthetic Veneers: The material's aesthetic properties make it an excellent choice for fabricating veneers that blend seamlessly with natural teeth.

3. Orthodontic Bonding Adhesive: ORMOCER can be utilized as an adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets and appliances to teeth.

Cutting Edge Mechanics

Edge Angles and Their Importance

• Edge Angle: The angle formed at the cutting edge of a bur blade. Increasing the edge angle reinforces the cutting edge, which helps to reduce the likelihood of blade fracture during use.
• Reinforcement: A larger edge angle provides more material at the cutting edge, enhancing its strength and durability.

Carbide vs. Steel Burs

• Carbide Burs:
  • Hardness and Wear Resistance: Carbide burs are known for their higher hardness and wear resistance compared to steel burs. This makes them suitable for cutting through hard dental tissues.
  • Brittleness: However, carbide burs are more brittle than steel burs, which means they are more prone to fracture if not designed properly.
  • Edge Angles: To minimize the risk of fractures, carbide burs require greater edge angles. This design consideration is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the bur during clinical procedures.

Interdependence of Angles

• Three Angles: The cutting edge of a bur is defined by three angles: the edge angle, the clearance angle, and the rake angle. These angles cannot be varied independently of each other.
  • Clearance Angle: An increase in the clearance angle (the angle between the cutting edge and the surface being cut) results in a decrease in the edge angle. This relationship is important for optimizing cutting efficiency and minimizing wear on the bur.

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements (RMGIs)

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements (RMGIs) represent a significant advancement in dental materials, combining the beneficial properties of both glass ionomer cements and composite resins. This overview will discuss the composition, advantages, and disadvantages of RMGIs, highlighting their role in modern dentistry.

1. Composition of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

A. Introduction

• First Introduced: RMGIs were first introduced as Vitrebond (3M), utilizing a powder-liquid system designed to enhance the properties of traditional glass ionomer cements.

B. Components

• Powder: The powder component consists of fluorosilicate glass, which provides the material with its glass ionomer properties. It also contains a photoinitiator or chemical initiator to facilitate setting.
• Liquid: The liquid component contains:
  • 15 to 25% Resin Component: Typically in the form of Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate (HEMA), which enhances the material's bonding and aesthetic properties.
  • Polyacrylic Acid Copolymer: This component contributes to the chemical adhesion properties of the cement.
  • Photoinitiator and Water: These components are essential for the setting reaction and workability of the material.

2. Advantages of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

RMGIs offer a range of benefits that make them suitable for various dental applications:

1. Extended Working Time: RMGIs provide a longer working time compared to traditional glass ionomers, allowing for more flexibility during placement.

2. Control on Setting: The setting reaction can be controlled through light curing, which allows for adjustments before the material hardens.

3. Good Adaptation: RMGIs exhibit excellent adaptation to tooth structure, which helps minimize gaps and improve the seal.

4. Chemical Adhesion to Enamel and Dentin: RMGIs bond chemically to both enamel and dentin, enhancing retention and reducing the risk of microleakage.

5. Fluoride Release: Like traditional glass ionomers, RMGIs release fluoride, which can help in the prevention of secondary caries.

6. Improved Aesthetics: The resin component allows for better color matching and aesthetics compared to conventional glass ionomers.

7. Low Interfacial Shrinkage Stress: RMGIs exhibit lower shrinkage stress upon setting compared to composite resins, reducing the risk of debonding or gap formation.

8. Superior Strength Characteristics: RMGIs generally have improved mechanical properties, making them suitable for a wider range of clinical applications.

3. Disadvantages of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

Despite their advantages, RMGIs also have some limitations:

1. Shrinkage on Setting: RMGIs can experience some degree of shrinkage during the setting process, which may affect the marginal integrity of the restoration.

2. Limited Depth of Cure: The depth of cure can be limited, especially when using more opaque lining cements. This can affect the effectiveness of the material in deeper cavities.

_{Pin size}

_{In general, increase in diameter of pin offers more retention but large sized pins can result in more stresses in dentin. Pins are available in four color coded sizes:}

_{Selection of pin size depends upon the following factors:}

_{·            Amount of dentin present}

_{·            Amount of retention required}

_{For most posterior restorations, Minikin size of pins is used because they provide maximum retention without causing crazing in dentin.}

_{A. Retention vs. Stress}

• _{Retention: Generally, an increase in the diameter of the pin offers more retention for the restoration.}
• _{Stress: However, larger pins can result in increased stresses in the dentin, which may lead to complications such as crazing or cracking of the tooth structure.}

_{2. Factors Influencing Pin Size Selection}

_{The selection of pin size depends on several factors:}

_{A. Amount of Dentin Present}

• _{Assessment: The amount of remaining dentin is a critical factor in determining the appropriate pin size. More dentin allows for the use of larger pins, while less dentin may necessitate smaller pins to avoid excessive stress.}

_{B. Amount of Retention Required}

• _{Retention Needs: The specific retention requirements of the restoration will also influence pin size selection. In cases where maximum retention is needed, larger pins may be considered, provided that sufficient dentin is available to accommodate them without causing damage.}

_{3. Recommended Pin Size for Posterior Restorations}

_{For most posterior restorations, the Minikin size pin (0.48 mm, color-coded red) is commonly used. This size provides a balance between adequate retention and minimizing the risk of causing crazing in the dentin.}

Mercury Exposure and Safety

Concentrations of Mercury in Air

• Typical Levels: Mercury concentrations in air can vary significantly:
  • Pure air: 0.002 µg/m³
  • Urban air: 0.05 µg/m³
  • Air near industrial parks: 3 µg/m³
  • Air in mercury mines: 300 µg/m³
• Threshold Limit Value (TLV): The generally accepted TLV for exposure to mercury vapor for a 40-hour work week is 50 µg/m³. Understanding these levels is crucial for ensuring safety in dental practices where amalgam is used.

Inlay Preparation

Inlay preparations are a common restorative procedure in dentistry, particularly for Class II restorations.

1. Definitions

A. Inlay

• An inlay is a restoration that is fabricated using an indirect procedure. It involves one or more tooth surfaces and may cap one or more cusps but does not cover all cusps.

2. Class II Inlay (Cast Metal) Preparation Procedure

A. Burs Used

• Recommended Burs:
  • No. 271: For initial cavity preparation.
  • No. 169 L: For refining the cavity shape and creating the proximal box.

B. Initial Cavity Preparation

• Similar to Class II Amalgam: The initial cavity preparation is performed similarly to that for Class II amalgam restorations, with the following differences:
  • Occlusal Entry Cut Depth: The initial occlusal entry should be approximately 1.5 mm deep.
  • Cavity Margins Divergence: All cavity margins must diverge occlusally by 2-5 degrees:
    • 2 degrees: When the vertical walls of the cavity are short.
    • 5 degrees: When the vertical walls are long.
  • Proximal Box Margins: The proximal box margins should clear the adjacent tooth by 0.2-0.5 mm, with 0.5 ± 0.2 mm being ideal.

C. Preparation of Bevels and Flares

• Primary and Secondary Flares:
  • Flares are created on the facial and lingual proximal walls, forming the walls in two planes.
  • The secondary flare widens the proximal box, which initially had a clearance of 0.5 mm from the adjacent tooth. This results in:
    • Marginal Metal in Embrasure Area: Placing the marginal metal in the embrasure area allows for better self-cleansing and easier access for cleaning and polishing without excessive dentin removal.
    • Marginal Metal Angle: A 40-degree angle, which is easily burnishable and strong.
    • Enamel Margin Angle: A 140-degree angle, which blunts the enamel margin and increases its strength.
  • Note: Secondary flares are omitted on the mesiofacial proximal walls of maxillary premolars and first molars for esthetic reasons.

D. Gingival Bevels

• Width: Gingival bevels should be 0.5-1 mm wide and blend with the secondary flare, resulting in a marginal metal angle of 30 degrees.
• Purpose:
  • Removal of weak enamel.
  • Creation of a burnishable 30-degree marginal metal.
  • Production of a lap sliding fit at the gingival margin.

E. Occlusal Bevels

• Location: Present on the cavosurface margins of the cavity on the occlusal surface.
• Width: Approximately 1/4th the depth of the respective wall, resulting in a marginal metal angle of 40 degrees.

3. Capping Cusps

A. Indications

• Cusp Involvement: Capping cusps is indicated when more than 1/2 of a cusp is involved and is mandatory when 2/3 or more is involved.

B. Advantages

• Weak Enamel Removal: Helps in removing weak enamel.
• Cavity Margin Location: Moves the cavity margin away from occlusal areas subjected to heavy forces.
• Visualization of Caries: Aids in visualizing the extent of caries, increasing convenience during preparation.

C. Cusp Reduction

• Uniform Metal Thickness: Cusp reduction must provide for a uniform 1.5 mm metal thickness over the reduced cusps.
• Facial Cusp Reduction: For maxillary premolars and first molars, the reduction of the facial cusp should be 0.75-1 mm for esthetic reasons.

D. Reverse Bevel (Counter Bevel)

• Definition: A bevel given on the margins of the reduced cusp.
• Width: Varies to extend beyond any occlusal contact with opposing teeth, resulting in a marginal metal angle of 30 degrees.

E. Retention Considerations

• Retention Form: Cusp reduction decreases the retention form due to reduced vertical wall height. Therefore, proximal retentive grooves are usually recommended.
• Collar and Skirt Features: These features can enhance retention and resistance form.