Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements (RMGIs)

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements (RMGIs) represent a significant advancement in dental materials, combining the beneficial properties of both glass ionomer cements and composite resins. This overview will discuss the composition, advantages, and disadvantages of RMGIs, highlighting their role in modern dentistry.

1. Composition of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

A. Introduction

• First Introduced: RMGIs were first introduced as Vitrebond (3M), utilizing a powder-liquid system designed to enhance the properties of traditional glass ionomer cements.

B. Components

• Powder: The powder component consists of fluorosilicate glass, which provides the material with its glass ionomer properties. It also contains a photoinitiator or chemical initiator to facilitate setting.
• Liquid: The liquid component contains:
  • 15 to 25% Resin Component: Typically in the form of Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate (HEMA), which enhances the material's bonding and aesthetic properties.
  • Polyacrylic Acid Copolymer: This component contributes to the chemical adhesion properties of the cement.
  • Photoinitiator and Water: These components are essential for the setting reaction and workability of the material.

2. Advantages of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

RMGIs offer a range of benefits that make them suitable for various dental applications:

1. Extended Working Time: RMGIs provide a longer working time compared to traditional glass ionomers, allowing for more flexibility during placement.

2. Control on Setting: The setting reaction can be controlled through light curing, which allows for adjustments before the material hardens.

3. Good Adaptation: RMGIs exhibit excellent adaptation to tooth structure, which helps minimize gaps and improve the seal.

4. Chemical Adhesion to Enamel and Dentin: RMGIs bond chemically to both enamel and dentin, enhancing retention and reducing the risk of microleakage.

5. Fluoride Release: Like traditional glass ionomers, RMGIs release fluoride, which can help in the prevention of secondary caries.

6. Improved Aesthetics: The resin component allows for better color matching and aesthetics compared to conventional glass ionomers.

7. Low Interfacial Shrinkage Stress: RMGIs exhibit lower shrinkage stress upon setting compared to composite resins, reducing the risk of debonding or gap formation.

8. Superior Strength Characteristics: RMGIs generally have improved mechanical properties, making them suitable for a wider range of clinical applications.

3. Disadvantages of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

Despite their advantages, RMGIs also have some limitations:

1. Shrinkage on Setting: RMGIs can experience some degree of shrinkage during the setting process, which may affect the marginal integrity of the restoration.

2. Limited Depth of Cure: The depth of cure can be limited, especially when using more opaque lining cements. This can affect the effectiveness of the material in deeper cavities.

Resistance Form in Dental Restorations

Resistance form is a critical concept in operative dentistry that refers to the design features of a cavity preparation that enhance the ability of a restoration to withstand masticatory forces without failure. This lecture will cover the key elements that contribute to resistance form, the factors affecting it, and the implications for different types of restorative materials.

1. Elements of Resistance Form

A. Design Features

1. Flat Pulpal and Gingival Floors:

   • Flat surfaces provide stability and help distribute occlusal forces evenly across the restoration, reducing the risk of displacement.

2. Box-Shaped Cavity:

   • A box-shaped preparation enhances resistance by providing a larger surface area for bonding and mechanical retention.

3. Inclusion of Weakened Tooth Structure:

   • Including weakened areas in the preparation helps to prevent fracture under masticatory forces by redistributing stress.

4. Rounded Internal Line Angles:

   • Rounding internal line angles reduces stress concentration points, which can lead to failure of the restoration.

5. Adequate Thickness of Restorative Material:

   • Sufficient thickness is necessary to ensure that the restoration can withstand occlusal forces without fracturing. The required thickness varies depending on the type of restorative material used.

6. Cusp Reduction for Capping:

   • When indicated, reducing cusps helps to provide adequate support for the restoration and prevents fracture.

B. Deepening of Pulpal Floor

• Increased Bulk: Deepening the pulpal floor increases the bulk of the restoration, enhancing its resistance to occlusal forces.

2. Features of Resistance Form

A. Box-Shaped Preparation

• A box-shaped cavity preparation is essential for providing resistance against displacement and fracture.

B. Flat Pulpal and Gingival Floors

• These features help the tooth resist occlusal masticatory forces without displacement.

C. Adequate Thickness of Restorative Material

• The thickness of the restorative material should be sufficient to prevent fracture of both the remaining tooth structure and the restoration. For example:
  • High Copper Amalgam: Minimum thickness of 1.5 mm.
  • Cast Metal: Minimum thickness of 1.0 mm.
  • Porcelain: Minimum thickness of 2.0 mm.
  • Composite and Glass Ionomer: Typically require thicknesses greater than 2.5 mm due to their wear potential.

D. Restriction of External Wall Extensions

• Limiting the extensions of external walls helps maintain strong marginal ridge areas with adequate dentin support.

E. Rounding of Internal Line Angles

• This feature reduces stress concentration points, enhancing the overall resistance form.

F. Consideration for Cusp Capping

• Depending on the amount of remaining tooth structure, cusp capping may be necessary to provide adequate support for the restoration.

3. Factors Affecting Resistance Form

A. Amount of Occlusal Stresses

• The greater the occlusal forces, the more robust the resistance form must be to prevent failure.

B. Type of Restoration Used

• Different materials have varying requirements for thickness and design to ensure adequate resistance.

C. Amount of Remaining Tooth Structure

• The more remaining tooth structure, the better the support for the restoration, which can enhance resistance form.

4. Clinical Implications

A. Cavity Preparation

• Proper cavity preparation is essential for achieving optimal resistance form. Dentists should consider the design features and material requirements when preparing cavities.

B. Material Selection

• Understanding the properties of different restorative materials is crucial for ensuring that the restoration can withstand the forces it will encounter in the oral environment.

C. Monitoring and Maintenance

• Regular monitoring of restorations is important to identify any signs of failure or degradation, allowing for timely intervention.

Early Childhood Caries (ECC) Classification

Early Childhood Caries (ECC) is a significant public health concern characterized by the presence of carious lesions in young children. It is classified into three types based on severity, affected teeth, and underlying causes. Understanding these classifications helps in diagnosing, preventing, and managing ECC effectively.

Type I ECC (Mild to Moderate)

A. Characteristics

• Affected Teeth: Carious lesions primarily involve the molars and incisors.
• Age Group: Typically observed in children aged 2 to 5 years.

B. Causes

• Dietary Factors: The primary cause is usually a combination of cariogenic semisolid or solid foods, such as sugary snacks and beverages.
• Oral Hygiene: Lack of proper oral hygiene practices contributes significantly to the development of caries.
• Progression: As the cariogenic challenge persists, the number of affected teeth tends to increase.

C. Clinical Implications

• Management: Emphasis on improving oral hygiene practices and dietary modifications can help control and reverse early carious lesions.

Type II ECC (Moderate to Severe)

A. Characteristics

• Affected Teeth: Labio-lingual carious lesions primarily affect the maxillary incisors, with or without molar caries, depending on the child's age.
• Age Group: Typically seen soon after the first tooth erupts.

B. Causes

• Feeding Practices: Common causes include inappropriate use of feeding bottles, at-will breastfeeding, or a combination of both.
• Oral Hygiene: Poor oral hygiene practices exacerbate the condition.
• Progression: If not controlled, Type II ECC can progress to more advanced stages of caries.

C. Clinical Implications

• Intervention: Early intervention is crucial, including education on proper feeding practices and oral hygiene to prevent further carious development.

Type III ECC (Severe)

A. Characteristics

• Affected Teeth: Carious lesions involve almost all teeth, including the mandibular incisors.
• Age Group: Usually observed in children aged 3 to 5 years.

B. Causes

• Multifactorial: The etiology is a combination of various factors, including poor oral hygiene, dietary habits, and possibly socio-economic factors.
• Rampant Nature: This type of ECC is rampant and can affect immune tooth surfaces, leading to extensive decay.

C. Clinical Implications

• Management: Requires comprehensive dental treatment, including restorative procedures and possibly extractions. Education on preventive measures and regular dental visits are essential to manage and prevent recurrence.

Mercury Release in Dental Procedures Involving Amalgam

Mercury is a key component of dental amalgam, and its release during various dental procedures has been a topic of concern due to potential health risks. Understanding the amounts of mercury released during different stages of amalgam handling is essential for dental professionals to implement safety measures and minimize exposure.

1. Mercury Release Quantification

A. Trituration

• Amount Released: 1-2 µg
• Description: Trituration is the process of mixing mercury with alloy particles to form a homogenous amalgam. During this process, small amounts of mercury can be released into the air, which can contribute to overall exposure.

B. Placement of Amalgam Restoration

• Amount Released: 6-8 µg
• Description: When placing an amalgam restoration, additional mercury may be released due to the manipulation of the material. This includes the handling and packing of the amalgam into the cavity preparation.

C. Dry Polishing

• Amount Released: 44 µg
• Description: Dry polishing of amalgam restorations generates the highest amount of mercury release among the listed procedures. The friction and heat generated during dry polishing can vaporize mercury, leading to increased exposure.

D. Wet Polishing

• Amount Released: 2-4 µg
• Description: Wet polishing, which involves the use of water to cool the restoration during polishing, results in significantly lower mercury release compared to dry polishing. The water helps to capture and reduce the amount of mercury vapor released into the air.

Resistance Form in Dental Restorations

Resistance Form

A. Design Features

1. Flat Pulpal and Gingival Floors:

   • Flat surfaces provide stability and help distribute occlusal forces evenly across the restoration, reducing the risk of displacement.

2. Box-Shaped Cavity:

   • A box-shaped preparation enhances resistance by providing a larger surface area for bonding and mechanical retention.

3. Inclusion of Weakened Tooth Structure:

   • Including weakened areas in the preparation helps to prevent fracture under masticatory forces by redistributing stress.

4. Rounded Internal Line Angles:

   • Rounding internal line angles reduces stress concentration points, which can lead to failure of the restoration.

5. Adequate Thickness of Restorative Material:

   • Sufficient thickness is necessary to ensure that the restoration can withstand occlusal forces without fracturing. The required thickness varies depending on the type of restorative material used.

6. Cusp Reduction for Capping:

   • When indicated, reducing cusps helps to provide adequate support for the restoration and prevents fracture.

B. Deepening of Pulpal Floor

• Increased Bulk: Deepening the pulpal floor increases the bulk of the restoration, enhancing its resistance to occlusal forces.

2. Features of Resistance Form

A. Box-Shaped Preparation

• A box-shaped cavity preparation is essential for providing resistance against displacement and fracture.

B. Flat Pulpal and Gingival Floors

• These features help the tooth resist occlusal masticatory forces without displacement.

C. Adequate Thickness of Restorative Material

• The thickness of the restorative material should be sufficient to prevent fracture of both the remaining tooth structure and the restoration. For example:
  • High Copper Amalgam: Minimum thickness of 1.5 mm.
  • Cast Metal: Minimum thickness of 1.0 mm.
  • Porcelain: Minimum thickness of 2.0 mm.
  • Composite and Glass Ionomer: Typically require thicknesses greater than 2.5 mm due to their wear potential.

D. Restriction of External Wall Extensions

• Limiting the extensions of external walls helps maintain strong marginal ridge areas with adequate dentin support.

E. Rounding of Internal Line Angles

• This feature reduces stress concentration points, enhancing the overall resistance form.

F. Consideration for Cusp Capping

• Depending on the amount of remaining tooth structure, cusp capping may be necessary to provide adequate support for the restoration.

3. Factors Affecting Resistance Form

A. Amount of Occlusal Stresses

• The greater the occlusal forces, the more robust the resistance form must be to prevent failure.

B. Type of Restoration Used

• Different materials have varying requirements for thickness and design to ensure adequate resistance.

C. Amount of Remaining Tooth Structure

• The more remaining tooth structure, the better the support for the restoration, which can enhance resistance form.

Glass ionomer cement is a tooth coloured material 
Material was based on reaction between silicate glass powder & polyacrylicacid.
They bond chemically to tooth structure & release fluoride for relatively long period

CLASSIFICATION 

Type I. For luting

Type II. For restoration 

Type II.1 Restorative esthetic 

Type II.2 Restorative reinforced

Type III. For liner & bases

Type IV. Fissure & sealent

Type V. As Orthodontic cement

Type VI. For core build up

Physical Properties

1. Low solubility
2. Coefficient of thermal expansion similar to dentin
3. Fluoride release and fluoride recharge
4. High compressive strengths
5. Bonds to tooth structure
6. Low flexural strength
7. Low shear strength
8. Dimensional change (slight expansion) (shrinks on setting, expands with water sorption)
9. Brittle
10.Lacks translucency
11.Rough surface texture

Indications for use of Type II glass ionomer cements 

1) non-stress bearing areas 

2) class III and V restorations in adults 

3) class I and II restorations in primary dentition 

4) temporary or “caries control” restorations 

5) crown margin repairs 

6) cement base under amalgam, resin, ceramics, direct and indirect gold 

7) core buildups when at least 3 walls of tooth are remaining (after crown preparation)

Contraindications 

1) high stress applications I. class IV and class II restorations II. cusp replacement III. core build-ups with less than 3 sound walls remaining

Composition

Factors affecting the rate or setting

1. Glass composition:Higher Alumina – Silica ratio, faster set and shorter working time.
2. Particle Size: finer the powder, faster the set.
3. Addition of Tartaric Acid:-Sharpens set without shortening the working time.
4. Relative proportions of the constituents: Greater the proportion of glass and lower the proportion of water, the faster the set.
5. Temperature

Setting Time

Type 1 - 4-5 min
type II - 7 min

PROPERTIES 

Adhesion :

- Glass ionomer cement bonds chemically to the tooth structure->reaction occur between carboxyl group of poly acid & calcium of hydroxyl apatite.
 
- Bonding with enamel is higher than that of dentin ,due to greater inorganic content. 

Esthetics :
-GIC is tooth coloured material & available in different shades.
Inferior to composites.
They lack translucency & rough surface texture.
Potential for discolouration & staining.

Biocompatibilty :

- Pulpal response to glass ionomer cement is favorable. 
- Pulpal response is mild due to 
- High buffering capacity of hydroxy apatite. 
- Large molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid ,which prevents entry into dentinal tubules. 

a) Pulp reaction – ZOE < Glass Ionomer < Zinc Phosphate 

b) Powder:liquid ratio influences acidity 

c) Solubility & Disintegration:-Initial solubility is high due to leaching of intermediate products.The complete setting reaction takes place in 24 hrs, cement should be protected from saliva during this period.

Anticariogenic properties :
- Fluoride is released from glass ionomer at the time of mixing & lies with in matrix.
Fluoride can be released out without affecting the physical properties of cement.

ADVANTAGE DISADVANTAGE