Behavioral Classification Systems in Pediatric Dentistry

Understanding children's behavior in the dental environment is crucial for effective treatment and management. Various classification systems have been developed to categorize these behaviors, which can assist dentists in guiding their approach, systematically recording behaviors, and evaluating research validity.

Importance of Behavioral Classification

• Behavior Guidance: Knowledge of behavioral classification systems helps dentists tailor their behavior guidance strategies to individual children.
• Systematic Recording: These systems provide a structured way to document children's behaviors during dental visits, facilitating better communication and understanding among dental professionals.
• Research Evaluation: Behavioral classifications can aid in assessing the validity of current research and practices in pediatric dentistry.

Wright’s Clinical Classification

Wright’s clinical classification categorizes children into three main groups based on their cooperative abilities:

1. Cooperative:

   • Children in this category exhibit positive behavior and are generally relaxed during dental visits. They may show enthusiasm and can be treated using straightforward behavior-shaping approaches. These children typically follow established guidelines and perform well within the framework provided.

2. Lacking in Cooperative Ability:

   • This group includes children who demonstrate significant difficulties in cooperating during dental procedures. They may require additional support and alternative strategies to facilitate treatment.

3. Potentially Cooperative:

   • Children in this category may show some willingness to cooperate but may also exhibit signs of apprehension or reluctance. They may need encouragement and reassurance to engage positively in the dental environment.

Frankl Behavioral Rating Scale

The Frankl behavioral rating scale is a widely used tool that divides observed behavior into four categories, ranging from definitely positive to definitely negative. The scale is as follows:

• Rating 1: Definitely Negative:

  • Characteristics: Refusal of treatment, forceful crying, fearfulness, or any other overt evidence of extreme negativity.

• Rating 2: Negative:

  • Characteristics: Reluctance to accept treatment, uncooperativeness, and some evidence of a negative attitude (e.g., sullen or withdrawn behavior).

• Rating 3: Positive:

  • Characteristics: Acceptance of treatment with cautious behavior at times; willingness to comply with the dentist, albeit with some reservations. The patient generally follows the dentist’s directions cooperatively.

• Rating 4: Definitely Positive:

  • Characteristics: Good rapport with the dentist, interest in dental procedures, and expressions of enjoyment (e.g., laughter).

Application of the Frankl Scale

• Research Tool: The Frankl method is popular in research settings for assessing children's behavior in dental contexts.
• Shorthand Recording: Dentists can use shorthand notations (e.g., “+” for positive behavior, “-” for negative behavior) to quickly document children's responses during visits.
• Limitations: While the scale is useful, it may not provide sufficient clinical information regarding uncooperative children. For example, simply recording “-” does not convey the nuances of a child's behavior. A more descriptive notation, such as “- tearful,” offers better insight into the clinical problem.

Classification of Amelogenesis Imperfecta

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a group of genetic conditions that affect the development of enamel, leading to various enamel defects. The classification of amelogenesis imperfecta is based on the phenotype of the enamel and the mode of inheritance. Below is a detailed classification of amelogenesis imperfecta.

Type I: Hypoplastic

Hypoplastic amelogenesis imperfecta is characterized by a deficiency in the amount of enamel produced. The enamel may appear thin, pitted, or smooth, depending on the specific subtype.

1. 1A: Hypoplastic Pitted

   • Inheritance: Autosomal dominant
   • Description: Enamel is pitted and has a rough surface texture.

2. 1B: Hypoplastic, Local

   • Inheritance: Autosomal dominant
   • Description: Localized areas of hypoplasia affecting specific teeth.

3. 1C: Hypoplastic, Local

   • Inheritance: Autosomal recessive
   • Description: Similar to 1B but inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.

4. 1D: Hypoplastic, Smooth

   • Inheritance: Autosomal dominant
   • Description: Enamel appears smooth with a lack of pits.

5. 1E: Hypoplastic, Smooth

   • Inheritance: Linked dominant
   • Description: Similar to 1D but linked to a dominant gene.

6. 1F: Hypoplastic, Rough

   • Inheritance: Autosomal dominant
   • Description: Enamel has a rough texture with hypoplastic features.

7. 1G: Enamel Agenesis

   • Inheritance: Autosomal recessive
   • Description: Complete absence of enamel on affected teeth.

Type II: Hypomaturation

Hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta is characterized by enamel that is softer and more prone to wear than normal enamel, often with a mottled appearance.

1. 2A: Hypomaturation, Pigmented

   • Inheritance: Autosomal recessive
   • Description: Enamel has a pigmented appearance, often with brown or yellow discoloration.

2. 2B: Hypomaturation

   • Inheritance: X-linked recessive
   • Description: Similar to 2A but inherited through the X chromosome.

3. 2D: Snow-Capped Teeth

   • Inheritance: Autosomal dominant
   • Description: Characterized by a white, snow-capped appearance on the incisal edges of teeth.

Type III: Hypocalcified

Hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta is characterized by enamel that is poorly mineralized, leading to soft, chalky teeth that are prone to rapid wear and caries.

1. 3A:

   • Inheritance: Autosomal dominant
   • Description: Enamel is poorly calcified, leading to significant structural weakness.

2. 3B:

   • Inheritance: Autosomal recessive
   • Description: Similar to 3A but inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.

Type IV: Hypomaturation, Hypoplastic with Taurodontism

This type combines features of both hypomaturation and hypoplasia, along with taurodontism, which is characterized by elongated pulp chambers and short roots.

1. 4A: Hypomaturation-Hypoplastic with Taurodontism

   • Inheritance: Autosomal dominant
   • Description: Enamel is both hypoplastic and hypomature, with associated taurodontism.

2. 4B: Hypoplastic-Hypomaturation with Taurodontism

   • Inheritance: Autosomal dominant
   • Description: Similar to 4A but with a focus on hypoplastic features.

Classification of Oral Habits

Oral habits can be classified based on various criteria, including their nature, impact, and the underlying motivations for the behavior. Below is a detailed classification of oral habits:

1. Based on Nature of the Habit

• Obsessive Habits (Deep Rooted):

  • International or Meaningful:
    • Examples: Nail biting, digit sucking, lip biting.
  • Masochistic (Self-Inflicting):
    • Examples: Gingival stripping (damaging the gums).
  • Unintentional (Empty):
    • Examples: Abnormal pillowing, chin propping.

• Non-Obsessive Habits (Easily Learned and Dropped):

  • Functional Habits:
    • Examples: Mouth breathing, tongue thrusting, bruxism (teeth grinding).

2. Based on Impact

• Useful Habits:
  • Habits that may have a positive or neutral effect on oral health.
• Harmful Habits:
  • Habits that can lead to dental issues, such as malocclusion, gingival damage, or tooth wear.

3. Based on Author Classifications

• James (1923):

  • a) Useful Habits
  • b) Harmful Habits

• Kingsley (1958):

  • a) Functional Oral Habits
  • b) Muscular Habits
  • c) Combined Habits

• Morris and Bohanna (1969):

  • a) Pressure Habits
  • b) Non-Pressure Habits
  • c) Biting Habits

• Klein (1971):

  • a) Empty Habits
  • b) Meaningful Habits

• Finn (1987):

  • I. a) Compulsive Habits
  • b) Non-Compulsive Habits
  • II. a) Primary Habits

4. Based on Functionality

• Functional Habits:
  • Habits that serve a purpose, such as aiding in speech or feeding.
• Dysfunctional Habits:
  • Habits that disrupt normal oral function or lead to negative consequences.

Classification of Mouthguards

Mouthguards are essential dental appliances used primarily in sports to protect the teeth, gums, and jaw from injury. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) has established a classification system for athletic mouthguards, which categorizes them into three types based on their design, fit, and level of customization.

Classification of Mouthguards

ASTM Designation: F697-80 (Reapproved 1986)

1. Type I: Stock Mouthguards

   • Description: These are pre-manufactured mouthguards that come in standard sizes and shapes.
   • Characteristics:
     • Readily available and inexpensive.
     • No customization for individual fit.
     • Typically made from a single layer of material.
     • May not provide optimal protection or comfort due to their generic fit.
   • Usage: Suitable for recreational sports or activities where the risk of dental injury is low.

2. Type II: Mouth-Formed Mouthguards

   • Description: Also known as "boil-and-bite" mouthguards, these are made from thermoplastic materials that can be softened in hot water and then molded to the shape of the wearer’s teeth.
   • Characteristics:
     • Offers a better fit than stock mouthguards.
     • Provides moderate protection and comfort.
     • Can be remolded if necessary, allowing for some customization.
   • Usage: Commonly used in youth sports and activities where a higher risk of dental injury exists.

3. Type III: Custom-Fabricated Mouthguards

   • Description: These mouthguards are custom-made by dental professionals using a dental cast of the individual’s teeth.
   • Characteristics:
     • Provides the best fit, comfort, and protection.
     • Made from high-quality materials, often with multiple layers for enhanced shock absorption.
     • Tailored to the specific dental anatomy of the wearer, ensuring optimal retention and stability.
   • Usage: Recommended for athletes participating in contact sports or those at high risk for dental injuries.

Summary of Preference

• The classification system is based on an ascending order of preference:
  • Type I (Stock Mouthguards): Least preferred due to lack of customization and fit.
  • Type II (Mouth-Formed Mouthguards): Moderate preference, offering better fit than stock options.
  • Type III (Custom-Fabricated Mouthguards): Most preferred for their superior fit, comfort, and protection.

Digit Sucking and Infantile Swallow

Introduction to Digit Sucking

Digit sucking is a common behavior observed in infants and young children. It can be categorized into two main types based on the underlying reasons for the behavior:

1. Nutritive Sucking

   • Definition: This type of sucking occurs during feeding and is essential for nourishment.
   • Timing: Nutritive sucking typically begins in the first few weeks of life.
   • Causes: It is primarily associated with feeding problems, where the infant may suck on fingers or digits as a substitute for breastfeeding or bottle-feeding.

2. Non-Nutritive Sucking

   • Definition: This type of sucking is not related to feeding and serves other psychological or emotional needs.
   • Causes: Non-nutritive sucking can arise from various psychological factors, including:
     • Hunger
     • Satisfying the innate sucking instinct
     • Feelings of insecurity
     • Desire for attention
   • Examples: Common forms of non-nutritive sucking habits include:
     • Thumb or finger sucking
     • Pacifier sucking

Non-Nutritive Sucking Habits (NMS Habits)

• Characteristics: Non-nutritive sucking habits are often comforting for children and can serve as a coping mechanism in stressful situations.
• Implications: While these habits are generally normal in early childhood, prolonged non-nutritive sucking can lead to dental issues, such as malocclusion or changes in the oral cavity.

Infantile Swallow

• Definition: The infantile swallow is a specific pattern of swallowing observed in infants.
• Characteristics:
  • Active contraction of the lip musculature.
  • The tongue tip is positioned forward, making contact with the lower lip.
  • Minimal activity of the posterior tongue and pharyngeal musculature.
• Posture: The tongue-to-lower lip contact is so prevalent in infants that it often becomes their resting posture. This can be observed when gently moving the infant's lip, causing the tongue tip to move in unison, suggesting a strong connection between the two.
• Developmental Changes: The sucking reflex and the infantile swallow typically diminish and disappear within the first year of life as the child matures and develops more complex feeding and swallowing patterns.

Pit and Fissure Sealants

Pit and fissure sealants are preventive dental materials used to protect occlusal surfaces of teeth from caries by sealing the grooves and pits that are difficult to clean. According to Mitchell and Gordon (1990), sealants can be classified based on several criteria, including polymerization methods, resin systems, filler content, and color.

Classification of Pit and Fissure Sealants

1. Polymerization Methods

Sealants can be differentiated based on how they harden or polymerize:

• a) Self-Activation (Mixing Two Components)

  • These sealants harden through a chemical reaction that occurs when two components are mixed together. This method does not require any external light source.

• b) Light Activation

  • Sealants that require a light source to initiate the polymerization process can be further categorized into generations:
    • First Generation: Ultraviolet Light
      • Utilizes UV light for curing, which can be less common due to safety concerns.
    • Second Generation: Self-Cure
      • These sealants harden through a chemical reaction without the need for light, similar to self-activating sealants.
    • Third Generation: Visible Light
      • Cured using visible light, which is more user-friendly and safer than UV light.
    • Fourth Generation: Fluoride-Releasing
      • These sealants not only provide a physical barrier but also release fluoride, which can help in remineralizing enamel and providing additional protection against caries.

2. Resin System

The type of resin used in sealants can also classify them:

• BIS-GMA (Bisphenol A Glycidyl Methacrylate)
  • A commonly used resin that provides good mechanical properties and adhesion.
• Urethane Acrylate
  • Offers enhanced flexibility and durability, making it suitable for areas subject to stress.

3. Filled and Unfilled

Sealants can be categorized based on the presence of fillers:

• Filled Sealants

  • Contain added particles that enhance strength and wear resistance. They may provide better wear characteristics but can be more viscous and difficult to apply.

• Unfilled Sealants

  • Typically have a smoother flow and are easier to apply, but may not be as durable as filled sealants.

4. Clear or Tinted

The color of the sealant can also influence its application:

• Clear Sealants

  • Have better flow characteristics, allowing for easier penetration into pits and fissures. They are less visible, which can be a disadvantage in monitoring during follow-up visits.

• Tinted Sealants

  • Easier for both patients and dentists to see, facilitating monitoring and assessment during recalls. However, they may have slightly different flow characteristics compared to clear sealants.

Application Process

• Sealants are applied in a viscous liquid state that enters the micropores of the tooth surface, which have been enlarged through acid conditioning.
• Once applied, the resin hardens due to either a self-hardening catalyst or the application of a light source.
• The extensions of the hardened resin that penetrate and fill the micropores are referred to as "tags," which help in retaining the sealant on the tooth surface.